On 1/6/23 19:23, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Seems to me that GCC code should just use nullptr directly not redefine NULL.
Sure, but that would lead to a huge patch which would rename NULL to nullptr, right? Martin
On 1/6/23 19:23, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Seems to me that GCC code should just use nullptr directly not redefine NULL.
Sure, but that would lead to a huge patch which would rename NULL to nullptr, right? Martin