> Am 03.01.2023 um 11:34 schrieb Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches > <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>: > > Hi! > > The following testcase ICEs on s390x-linux (e.g. with -march=z13). > The problem is that target is (subreg/s/u:SI (reg/v:DI 66 [ x+-4 ]) 4) > and we call convert_move from temp to the SUBREG_REG of that, expecting > to extend the value properly. That works nicely if temp has some > scalar integer mode (or partial one), but ICEs when temp has V4QImode > on the assertion that from and to modes have the same bitsize. > store_expr generally allows say store from V4QI to SI target because > they have the same size and if temp is a CONST_INT, we already have code > to convert the constant properly, so the following patch just adds handling > of non-scalar integer modes by converting them to the mode of target > first before convert_move extends them. > > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, i686-linux and s390x-linux, ok for > trunk? Ok Richard > 2023-01-03 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> > > PR middle-end/108264 > * expr.cc (store_expr): For stores into SUBREG_PROMOTED_* targets > from source which doesn't have scalar integral mode first convert > it to outer_mode. > > * gcc.dg/pr108264.c: New test. > > --- gcc/expr.cc.jj 2023-01-02 09:32:23.000000000 +0100 > +++ gcc/expr.cc 2023-01-02 16:48:13.226990815 +0100 > @@ -6226,6 +6226,9 @@ store_expr (tree exp, rtx target, int ca > temp = convert_modes (inner_mode, outer_mode, temp, > SUBREG_PROMOTED_SIGN (target)); > } > + else if (!SCALAR_INT_MODE_P (GET_MODE (temp))) > + temp = convert_modes (outer_mode, TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (exp)), > + temp, SUBREG_PROMOTED_SIGN (target)); > > convert_move (SUBREG_REG (target), temp, > SUBREG_PROMOTED_SIGN (target)); > --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr108264.c.jj 2023-01-02 17:01:14.865887522 +0100 > +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr108264.c 2023-01-02 17:00:52.238209030 +0100 > @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ > +/* PR middle-end/108264 */ > +/* { dg-do compile } */ > +/* { dg-options "-O2" } */ > +/* { dg-additional-options "-fpic" { target fpic } } */ > + > +int v; > +extern int bar (void); > + > +static inline void > +foo (char *d) > +{ > + switch (bar ()) > + { > + case 2: > + d[0] = d[1] = d[2] = d[3] = v; > + break; > + case 4: > + d[0] = 0; > + } > +} > + > +int > +baz (int x) > +{ > + foo ((char *) &x); > + return x; > +} > > Jakub >
Re: [PATCH] expr: Fix up store_expr into SUBREG_PROMOTED_* target [PR108264]
Richard Biener via Gcc-patches Tue, 03 Jan 2023 03:02:55 -0800
- [PATCH] expr: Fix up store_expr into SUBREG... Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
- Re: [PATCH] expr: Fix up store_expr in... Richard Biener via Gcc-patches