I would suggest you could send all necessary parts like binutils, glibc and/or qemu together future, so that we could easier test that?
On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 2:25 AM Palmer Dabbelt <pal...@dabbelt.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 27 Dec 2022 10:24:10 PST (-0800), gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org wrote: > > > > > > On 12/12/22 23:49, shi...@iscas.ac.cn wrote: > >> From: Liao Shihua <shi...@iscas.ac.cn> > >> > >> This patch support rv64 insn in ilp32 ABI. It was inspired by > >> aarch64 both > >> support 64-bit and 32-bit ABI with the same set of instructions. > >> > >> > >> gcc/ChangeLog: > >> > >> * config.gcc: Implememt ilp32* with rv64*. > >> * config/riscv/riscv.cc (riscv_option_override): Remove the > >> constraint between RV64 and ILP32. > >> * config/riscv/riscv.h (TARGET_ILP32): Define TARGET_ILP32 with > >> riscv_abi. > >> (POINTER_SIZE):POINTER_SIZE will change with TARGET_ILP32. > >> (Pmode):Likewise. > >> * config/riscv/riscv.md: Convert split mode with Pmode and change > >> mode form Xmode to Pmode in stack_tie. > > This is a new feature and thus I think we should defer to gcc-14 unless > > there is a compelling need. > > I agree. This is a pretty big one with a lot of ABI-related > complications, so let's just play it safe.
