On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 7:00 PM Jonathan Yong via Gcc-patches
<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> On 12/22/22 12:28, i.nix...@autistici.org wrote:
> > On 2022-12-22 12:21, Jonathan Yong wrote:
> >
> > hello,
> >
> >> On 12/16/22 19:20, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> >>>> The libgcc parts look reasonable to me, but I can't approve them.
> >>>> Maybe Jonathan Yong can approve those parts as mingw-w64 target
> >>>> maintainer, or maybe a libgcc approver can do so.
> >>>
> >>> OK.
> >>>
> >>>> The libstdc++ parts are OK for trunk. IIUC they could go in
> >>>> separately, they just wouldn't be very much use without the libgcc
> >>>> changes.
> >>>
> >>> Sure thing.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Ping, need help to commit it?
> >
> > yes, it would be great if we can merge the path into gcc-13!
> >
> > I've tested it on gcc-12-branch and gcc-master for i686/x86_64 windows,
> > with msvcrt and ucrt runtime - works as it should!
> >
> > Eric ^^^
> >
> >
> >
> > best!
>
> Done, pushed to master branch. Thanks Eric.
I think this might have broken fortran. I'm assuming because the
backtrace includes gthr.h, and I just did a git pull:
In file included from /tmp/rtmingw/mingw/include/windows.h:71,
from ../libgcc/gthr-default.h:606,
from ../../../libgfortran/../libgcc/gthr.h:148,
from ../../../libgfortran/io/io.h:33,
from ../../../libgfortran/runtime/error.c:27:
../../../libgfortran/io/io.h:298:24: error: expected identifier before
numeric constant
298 | { CC_LIST, CC_FORTRAN, CC_NONE,
| ^~~~~~~
