On Sat, Dec 17, 2022 at 09:12:43AM -0800, Jerry D via Gcc-patches wrote:
> The attached patch fixes a regression and is a patch from Steve. I have
> regression tested it and provided a test case. It is fairly simple and I
> will commit under the "simple" rule in a little while.
>
> Thanks Steve for Patch. Thanks Harald for helping me get back up to speed on
> the git magic.
The pr107397.f90 test FAILs for me, one problem was that the
added diagnostics has an indefinite article before BOZ, but
the test dg-error didn't. The other problem was that on the
other dg-error there was no space between the string and closing
}, so it was completely ignored and the error was an excess
error.
2022-12-19 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
PR fortran/107397
* gfortran.dg/pr107397.f90: Adjust expected diagnostic wording and
add space between dg-error string and closing }.
--- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr107397.f90.jj 2022-12-19 11:09:13.793166473
+0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr107397.f90 2022-12-19 11:23:02.981322107
+0100
@@ -4,6 +4,6 @@ program p
type t
real :: a = 1.0
end type
- type(t), parameter :: x = z'1' ! { dg-error "incompatible with BOZ" }
- x%a = x%a + 2 ! { dg-error "has no IMPLICIT type"}
+ type(t), parameter :: x = z'1' ! { dg-error "incompatible with a BOZ" }
+ x%a = x%a + 2 ! { dg-error "has no IMPLICIT type" }
end
Jakub
