On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 03:43:16PM -0500, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> Id actually prefer to avoid passing the tree code around... we're trying to
> avoid that sort of thing even though Aldy temporarily introduced them to
> range-ops. Hes suppose to remove that next stage 1 :-P Ideally anything
> "special" is locally contained to the specific routine.
Would a bool divide_op2 argument be better (perhaps defaulted to false)?
Inlining float_binary_op_range_finish by hand doesn't seem to be a good
idea, if it needs to be changed, it would need to be changed in multiple
places...
Jakub
