On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 3:54 PM Iain Sandoe <i...@sandoe.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Hi Uros,
>
> > On 5 Dec 2022, at 10:37, Uros Bizjak via Gcc-patches 
> > <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 4, 2022 at 9:30 PM Iain Sandoe <i...@sandoe.co.uk> wrote:
> >>
>
> >> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> >>
> >>        * gcc.target/x86_64/abi/bf16/args.h: Make xmm_regs, x87_regs extern.
> >>        * gcc.target/x86_64/abi/bf16/m256bf16/args.h: Likewise.
> >>        * gcc.target/x86_64/abi/bf16/m512bf16/args.h: Likewise.
> >>        * gcc.target/x86_64/abi/bf16/asm-support.S: Add Mach-O variant.
> >>        * gcc.target/x86_64/abi/bf16/m256bf16/asm-support.S: Likewise.
> >>        * gcc.target/x86_64/abi/bf16/m512bf16/asm-support.S: Likewise.
> >
> > Please note that in other directories asm-support-darwin.s is
> > introduced and included via .exp file. Is there a reason a different
> > approach is introduced here?
>
> Since it seems that testcases get added and amended without considering any
> sub-target apart from x86_64-linux-gnu (even by very experienced 
> contributors),
> I was hoping that the Darwin section might prompt folks to remember that there
> are several other sub-targets.
>
> However, the main thing is to fix the tests .. so here’s a version using 
> separate
> files.

 extern void (*callthis)(void);
 extern unsigned long long
rax,rbx,rcx,rdx,rsi,rdi,rsp,rbp,r8,r9,r10,r11,r12,r13,r14,r15;
-XMM_T xmm_regs[16];
-X87_T x87_regs[8];
+extern XMM_T xmm_regs[16];
+extern X87_T x87_regs[8];

Do you still need this change? Existing test files are compiled without extern.

+    .globl    _callthis
+    .zerofill __DATA,__bss,_callthis,8,3
+    .globl    _rax
+    .zerofill __DATA,__bss,_rax,8,3
+    .globl    _rbx
+    .zerofill __DATA,__bss,_rbx,8,3
+    .globl    _rcx
+    .zerofill __DATA,__bss,_rcx,8,3
+    .globl    _rdx
+    .zerofill __DATA,__bss,_rdx,8,3
...

I wonder if the above approach is better than existing:

    .comm    _callthis,8
    .comm    _rax,8
    .comm    _rbx,8
    .comm    _rcx,8
    .comm    _rdx,8
...

It is strange to have two different approaches for similar tests. If
the new approach is better, we should also change existing asm-support
files.

Uros.

Reply via email to