Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
> Prathamesh Kulkarni <prathamesh.kulka...@linaro.org> writes:
>> Hi,
>> For the following test-case:
>>
>> int16x8_t foo(int16_t x, int16_t y)
>> {
>>   return (int16x8_t) { x, y, x, y, x, y, x, y };
>> }
>>
>> Code gen at -O3:
>> foo:
>>         dup    v0.8h, w0
>>         ins     v0.h[1], w1
>>         ins     v0.h[3], w1
>>         ins     v0.h[5], w1
>>         ins     v0.h[7], w1
>>         ret
>>
>> For 16 elements, it results in 8 ins instructions which might not be
>> optimal perhaps.
>> I guess, the above code-gen would be equivalent to the following ?
>> dup v0.8h, w0
>> dup v1.8h, w1
>> zip1 v0.8h, v0.8h, v1.8h
>>
>> I have attached patch to do the same, if number of elements >= 8,
>> which should be possibly better compared to current code-gen ?
>> Patch passes bootstrap+test on aarch64-linux-gnu.
>> Does the patch look OK ?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Prathamesh
>>
>> diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
>> index c91df6f5006..e5dea70e363 100644
>> --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
>> +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
>> @@ -22028,6 +22028,39 @@ aarch64_expand_vector_init (rtx target, rtx vals)
>>        return;
>>      }
>>  
>> +  /* Check for interleaving case.
>> +     For eg if initializer is (int16x8_t) {x, y, x, y, x, y, x, y}.
>> +     Generate following code:
>> +     dup v0.h, x
>> +     dup v1.h, y
>> +     zip1 v0.h, v0.h, v1.h
>> +     for "large enough" initializer.  */
>> +
>> +  if (n_elts >= 8)
>> +    {
>> +      int i;
>> +      for (i = 2; i < n_elts; i++)
>> +    if (!rtx_equal_p (XVECEXP (vals, 0, i), XVECEXP (vals, 0, i % 2)))
>> +      break;
>> +
>> +      if (i == n_elts)
>> +    {
>> +      machine_mode mode = GET_MODE (target);
>> +      rtx dest[2];
>> +
>> +      for (int i = 0; i < 2; i++)
>> +        {
>> +          rtx x = copy_to_mode_reg (GET_MODE_INNER (mode), XVECEXP (vals, 
>> 0, i));
>
> Formatting nit: long line.
>
>> +          dest[i] = gen_reg_rtx (mode);
>> +          aarch64_emit_move (dest[i], gen_vec_duplicate (mode, x));
>> +        }
>
> This could probably be written:
>
>         for (int i = 0; i < 2; i++)
>           {
>             rtx x = expand_vector_broadcast (mode, XVECEXP (vals, 0, i));
>             dest[i] = force_reg (GET_MODE_INNER (mode), x);

Oops, I meant "mode" rather than "GET_MODE_INNER (mode)", sorry.

>           }
>
> which avoids forcing constant elements into a register before the duplication.
> OK with that change if it works.
>
> Thanks,
> Richard
>
>> +
>> +      rtvec v = gen_rtvec (2, dest[0], dest[1]);
>> +      emit_set_insn (target, gen_rtx_UNSPEC (mode, v, UNSPEC_ZIP1));
>> +      return;
>> +    }
>> +    }
>> +
>>    enum insn_code icode = optab_handler (vec_set_optab, mode);
>>    gcc_assert (icode != CODE_FOR_nothing);
>>  
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/interleave-init-1.c 
>> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/interleave-init-1.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 00000000000..ee775048589
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/interleave-init-1.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
>> +/* { dg-do compile } */
>> +/* { dg-options "-O3" } */
>> +/* { dg-final { check-function-bodies "**" "" "" } } */
>> +
>> +#include <arm_neon.h>
>> +
>> +/*
>> +** foo:
>> +**  ...
>> +**  dup     v[0-9]+\.8h, w[0-9]+
>> +**  dup     v[0-9]+\.8h, w[0-9]+
>> +**  zip1    v[0-9]+\.8h, v[0-9]+\.8h, v[0-9]+\.8h
>> +**  ...
>> +**  ret
>> +*/
>> +
>> +int16x8_t foo(int16_t x, int y)
>> +{
>> +  int16x8_t v = (int16x8_t) {x, y, x, y, x, y, x, y}; 
>> +  return v;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> +** foo2:
>> +**  ...
>> +**  dup     v[0-9]+\.8h, w[0-9]+
>> +**  movi    v[0-9]+\.8h, 0x1
>> +**  zip1    v[0-9]+\.8h, v[0-9]+\.8h, v[0-9]+\.8h
>> +**  ...
>> +**  ret
>> +*/
>> +
>> +int16x8_t foo2(int16_t x) 
>> +{
>> +  int16x8_t v = (int16x8_t) {x, 1, x, 1, x, 1, x, 1}; 
>> +  return v;
>> +}

Reply via email to