On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 07:14 -0700, Nathan Froyd wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > > > BTW, do you have the numbers of CSiBE with this? > > > > Only for "-m4-single -ml -O2 -mpretend-cmove" so far. > > Not so spectacular :T > > I'll also do a comparison of more variants to see if something went > > really bad. It's a bit difficult to isolate the degradations because > > there's quite some code reordering happening after the patch... > > Are you looking at execution time or code size? If the latter, you > could try disabling scheduling for comparison purposes > (-fno-schedule-insns -fno-schedule-insns2). Even if you're looking at > execution time, disabling scheduling might make it easier to see where > things are going wrong in the patched code.
Code size only. Thanks for the hint, will try it out. Cheers, Oleg
