The existence of this option makes users think they need it (even though
it's in neither -Wall nor -Wextra). Document that there's a better
option (since 2011).
OK for trunk?
-- >8 --
The newer -Wdelete-non-virtual-dtor has no false positives and fewer
bugs. There is very little reason to use -Wnon-virtual-dtor instead.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* doc/invoke.texi (C++ Dialect Options): Recommend using
-Wdelete-non-virtual-dtor instead of -Wnon-virtual-dtor.
---
gcc/doc/invoke.texi | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
index 330da6eb5d4..4899bd1ea4c 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
@@ -3986,6 +3986,9 @@ destructor itself or in an accessible polymorphic base
class, in which
case it is possible but unsafe to delete an instance of a derived
class through a pointer to the class itself or base class. This
warning is automatically enabled if @option{-Weffc++} is specified.
+The @option{-Wdelete-non-virtual-dtor} option (enabled by @option{-Wall})
+should be preferred because it warns about the unsafe cases without false
+positives.
@item -Wregister @r{(C++ and Objective-C++ only)}
@opindex Wregister
--
2.38.1
