On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 01:49:36PM +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 11/15/22 11:07, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 11:02:53AM +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
> >>> Is it allowed to merge libsanitizer from LLVM in stage 3? If not I'd
> >>> like to cherry pick some commits from LLVM [to fix some stupid errors
> >>> I've made in LoongArch libasan :(].
> >>
> >> I'm sorry but I was really busy with the porting of the documentation to
> >> Sphinx.
> >>
> >> Anyway, yes, we should make one one libsanitizer merge, but RM should
> >> likely
> >> approve it: Richi, Jakub, do you support it?
> >
> > Could you please prepare a patch, so that we can see how much actually
> > changed and decide based on that whether to go for a merge or cherry-picking
> > one or more commits?
>
> Sure, there it is. There's a minor change in output format that I address in
> 0003 patch.
>
> Apart from that, I was able to run all tests on x86_64-linux-gnu.
> Patch statistics:
> 46 files changed, 524 insertions(+), 252 deletions(-)
>
> I'm running build on ppc64le and if you're fine, I'm going to finish
> a proper libsanitizer testing procedure.
Ok.
Jakub
