Tamar Christina <[email protected]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> Ping and updated patch.
>
> Bootstrapped Regtested on aarch64-none-linux-gnu and no issues.
>
> Ok for master?
>
> Thanks,
> Tamar
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> * config/aarch64/aarch64.md (*tb<optab><mode>1): Rename to...
> (*tb<optab><ALLI:mode><GPI:mode>1): ... this.
> (tbranch<mode>4): New.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * gcc.target/aarch64/tbz_1.c: New test.
>
> --- inline copy of patch ---
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md
> index
> 2bc2684b82c35a44e0a2cea6e3aaf32d939f8cdf..d7684c93fba5b717d568e1a4fd712bde55c7c72e
> 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md
> +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md
> @@ -943,12 +943,29 @@ (define_insn "*cb<optab><mode>1"
> (const_int 1)))]
> )
>
> -(define_insn "*tb<optab><mode>1"
> +(define_expand "tbranch<mode>4"
> [(set (pc) (if_then_else
> - (EQL (zero_extract:DI (match_operand:GPI 0 "register_operand"
> "r")
> - (const_int 1)
> - (match_operand 1
> - "aarch64_simd_shift_imm_<mode>" "n"))
> + (match_operator 0 "aarch64_comparison_operator"
> + [(match_operand:ALLI 1 "register_operand")
> + (match_operand:ALLI 2
> "aarch64_simd_shift_imm_<ALLI:mode>")])
> + (label_ref (match_operand 3 "" ""))
> + (pc)))]
> + "optimize > 0"
Why's the pattern conditional on optimize? Seems a valid choice at -O0 too.
I think the split here shows the difficulty with having a single optab
and a comparison operator though. operand 0 can be something like:
(eq x 1)
but we're not comparing x for equality with 1. We're testing whether
bit 1 is zero. This means that operand 0 can't be taken literally
and can't be used directly in insn patterns.
In an earlier review, I'd said:
For the TB instructions (and for other similar instructions that I've
seen on other architectures) it would be more useful to have a single-bit
test, with operand 4 specifying the bit position. Arguably it might then
be better to have separate eq and ne optabs, to avoid the awkward doubling
of the operands (operand 1 contains operands 2 and 3).
I think we should do that eq/ne split (sorry for not pushing harder for
it before).
Thanks,
Richard
> +{
> + rtx bitvalue = gen_reg_rtx (DImode);
> + rtx tmp = simplify_gen_subreg (DImode, operands[1], GET_MODE
> (operands[1]), 0);
> + emit_insn (gen_extzv (bitvalue, tmp, const1_rtx, operands[2]));
> + operands[2] = const0_rtx;
> + operands[1] = aarch64_gen_compare_reg (GET_CODE (operands[0]), bitvalue,
> + operands[2]);
> +})
> +
> +(define_insn "*tb<optab><ALLI:mode><GPI:mode>1"
> + [(set (pc) (if_then_else
> + (EQL (zero_extract:GPI (match_operand:ALLI 0 "register_operand"
> "r")
> + (const_int 1)
> + (match_operand 1
> + "aarch64_simd_shift_imm_<ALLI:mode>"
> "n"))
> (const_int 0))
> (label_ref (match_operand 2 "" ""))
> (pc)))
> @@ -959,15 +976,15 @@ (define_insn "*tb<optab><mode>1"
> {
> if (get_attr_far_branch (insn) == 1)
> return aarch64_gen_far_branch (operands, 2, "Ltb",
> - "<inv_tb>\\t%<w>0, %1, ");
> + "<inv_tb>\\t%<ALLI:w>0, %1, ");
> else
> {
> operands[1] = GEN_INT (HOST_WIDE_INT_1U << UINTVAL (operands[1]));
> - return "tst\t%<w>0, %1\;<bcond>\t%l2";
> + return "tst\t%<ALLI:w>0, %1\;<bcond>\t%l2";
> }
> }
> else
> - return "<tbz>\t%<w>0, %1, %l2";
> + return "<tbz>\t%<ALLI:w>0, %1, %l2";
> }
> [(set_attr "type" "branch")
> (set (attr "length")
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/tbz_1.c
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/tbz_1.c
> new file mode 100644
> index
> 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..86f5d3e23cf7f1ea6f3596549ce1a0cff6774463
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/tbz_1.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-additional-options "-O2 -std=c99 -fno-unwind-tables
> -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables" } */
> +/* { dg-final { check-function-bodies "**" "" "" { target { le } } } } */
> +
> +#include <stdbool.h>
> +
> +void h(void);
> +
> +/*
> +** g1:
> +** tbnz x[0-9]+, #?0, .L([0-9]+)
> +** ret
> +** ...
> +*/
> +void g1(bool x)
> +{
> + if (__builtin_expect (x, 0))
> + h ();
> +}
> +
> +/*
> +** g2:
> +** tbz x[0-9]+, #?0, .L([0-9]+)
> +** b h
> +** ...
> +*/
> +void g2(bool x)
> +{
> + if (__builtin_expect (x, 1))
> + h ();
> +}
> +
> +/*
> +** g3_ge:
> +** tbnz w[0-9]+, #?31, .L[0-9]+
> +** b h
> +** ...
> +*/
> +void g3_ge(int x)
> +{
> + if (__builtin_expect (x >= 0, 1))
> + h ();
> +}
> +
> +/*
> +** g3_gt:
> +** cmp w[0-9]+, 0
> +** ble .L[0-9]+
> +** b h
> +** ...
> +*/
> +void g3_gt(int x)
> +{
> + if (__builtin_expect (x > 0, 1))
> + h ();
> +}
> +
> +/*
> +** g3_lt:
> +** tbz w[0-9]+, #?31, .L[0-9]+
> +** b h
> +** ...
> +*/
> +void g3_lt(int x)
> +{
> + if (__builtin_expect (x < 0, 1))
> + h ();
> +}
> +
> +/*
> +** g3_le:
> +** cmp w[0-9]+, 0
> +** bgt .L[0-9]+
> +** b h
> +** ...
> +*/
> +void g3_le(int x)
> +{
> + if (__builtin_expect (x <= 0, 1))
> + h ();
> +}
> +
> +/*
> +** g5:
> +** mov w[0-9]+, 65279
> +** tst w[0-9]+, w[0-9]+
> +** beq .L[0-9]+
> +** b h
> +** ...
> +*/
> +void g5(int x)
> +{
> + if (__builtin_expect (x & 0xfeff, 1))
> + h ();
> +}
