Hi!

I've noticed I've made a typo in the name of the function.
Fixed thusly.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, committed
as obvious to trunk.

2022-11-15  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

        * cp-tree.h (next_common_initial_seqence): Rename to ...
        (next_common_initial_sequence): ... this.
        * typeck.cc (next_common_initial_seqence): Rename to ...
        (next_common_initial_sequence): ... this.
        (layout_compatible_type_p): Call next_common_initial_sequence
        rather than next_common_initial_seqence.
        * semantics.cc (is_corresponding_member_aggr): Likewise.

--- gcc/cp/cp-tree.h.jj 2022-11-14 13:35:34.311158621 +0100
+++ gcc/cp/cp-tree.h    2022-11-14 13:41:29.817322405 +0100
@@ -7982,7 +7982,7 @@ extern bool comp_except_specs                     (const_t
 extern bool comptypes                          (tree, tree, int);
 extern bool same_type_ignoring_top_level_qualifiers_p (tree, tree);
 extern bool similar_type_p                     (tree, tree);
-extern bool next_common_initial_seqence                (tree &, tree &);
+extern bool next_common_initial_sequence       (tree &, tree &);
 extern bool layout_compatible_type_p           (tree, tree);
 extern bool compparms                          (const_tree, const_tree);
 extern int comp_cv_qualification               (const_tree, const_tree);
--- gcc/cp/typeck.cc.jj 2022-11-14 13:35:34.474156404 +0100
+++ gcc/cp/typeck.cc    2022-11-14 13:42:07.328812124 +0100
@@ -1779,7 +1779,7 @@ similar_type_p (tree type1, tree type2)
    the common initial sequence.  */
 
 bool
-next_common_initial_seqence (tree &memb1, tree &memb2)
+next_common_initial_sequence (tree &memb1, tree &memb2)
 {
   while (memb1)
     {
@@ -1871,7 +1871,7 @@ layout_compatible_type_p (tree type1, tr
        {
          while (1)
            {
-             if (!next_common_initial_seqence (field1, field2))
+             if (!next_common_initial_sequence (field1, field2))
                return false;
              if (field1 == NULL_TREE)
                return true;
--- gcc/cp/semantics.cc.jj      2022-11-14 13:35:34.429157016 +0100
+++ gcc/cp/semantics.cc 2022-11-14 13:41:47.930076022 +0100
@@ -11665,7 +11665,7 @@ is_corresponding_member_aggr (location_t
   tree ret = boolean_false_node;
   while (1)
     {
-      bool r = next_common_initial_seqence (field1, field2);
+      bool r = next_common_initial_sequence (field1, field2);
       if (field1 == NULL_TREE || field2 == NULL_TREE)
        break;
       if (r

        Jakub

Reply via email to