> >>>> Sorry for the breakage. However, I contacted you (and your colleague) > >>>> and haven't received > >>>> any feedback for a couple of weeks. > >>> > >>> Right although I did give you feedback that what you sent wasn’t in a > >>> suitable form for review wrt Ada. > >> > >> Sure, but sending a patch set to gcc-patches wouldn't have worked either, > >> we've got quite a strict > >> email size limit.
Note that the Ada part should have been quite limited in size given that the doc was already in .rst format, which is why I was expecting a smaller patch to review on the Ada side. > >> Anyway, hope the AdaCore build would be fixable with a reasonable amount > >> of effort? > > > > Unclear yet. We'll probably need to change and possibly partially revert the > > Ada changes, we'll see. > > Hello. > > Note the Sphinx changes will be reverted today: > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2022-November/239983.html > > Sorry for your extra work. Understood, thanks for your efforts and sorry you had to revert. Clearly a change which requires a bleeding edge version of sphinx cannot be pushed at this stage, that's premature. Cheers, Arno
