Until now, SVE intrinsics that map directly to unspecs
have always used type suffix 0 to distinguish between signed
integers, unsigned integers, and floating-point values.
SME adds functions that need to use type suffix 1 instead.
This patch generalises the classes accordingly.
gcc/
* config/aarch64/aarch64-sve-builtins-functions.h
(unspec_based_function_base): Allow type suffix 1 to determine
the mode of the operation.
(unspec_based_fused_function): Update accordingly.
(unspec_based_fused_lane_function): Likewise.
---
.../aarch64/aarch64-sve-builtins-functions.h | 29 ++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-sve-builtins-functions.h
b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-sve-builtins-functions.h
index 472e26c17ff..2fd135aab07 100644
--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-sve-builtins-functions.h
+++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-sve-builtins-functions.h
@@ -229,18 +229,21 @@ class unspec_based_function_base : public function_base
public:
CONSTEXPR unspec_based_function_base (int unspec_for_sint,
int unspec_for_uint,
- int unspec_for_fp)
+ int unspec_for_fp,
+ unsigned int suffix_index = 0)
: m_unspec_for_sint (unspec_for_sint),
m_unspec_for_uint (unspec_for_uint),
- m_unspec_for_fp (unspec_for_fp)
+ m_unspec_for_fp (unspec_for_fp),
+ m_suffix_index (suffix_index)
{}
/* Return the unspec code to use for INSTANCE, based on type suffix 0. */
int
unspec_for (const function_instance &instance) const
{
- return (!instance.type_suffix (0).integer_p ? m_unspec_for_fp
- : instance.type_suffix (0).unsigned_p ? m_unspec_for_uint
+ auto &suffix = instance.type_suffix (m_suffix_index);
+ return (!suffix.integer_p ? m_unspec_for_fp
+ : suffix.unsigned_p ? m_unspec_for_uint
: m_unspec_for_sint);
}
@@ -249,6 +252,9 @@ public:
int m_unspec_for_sint;
int m_unspec_for_uint;
int m_unspec_for_fp;
+
+ /* Which type suffix is used to choose between the unspecs. */
+ unsigned int m_suffix_index;
};
/* A function_base for functions that have an associated unspec code.
@@ -301,7 +307,8 @@ public:
rtx
expand (function_expander &e) const override
{
- return e.use_exact_insn (CODE (unspec_for (e), e.vector_mode (0)));
+ return e.use_exact_insn (CODE (unspec_for (e),
+ e.vector_mode (m_suffix_index)));
}
};
@@ -355,16 +362,16 @@ public:
{
int unspec = unspec_for (e);
insn_code icode;
- if (e.type_suffix (0).float_p)
+ if (e.type_suffix (m_suffix_index).float_p)
{
/* Put the operands in the normal (fma ...) order, with the accumulator
last. This fits naturally since that's also the unprinted operand
in the asm output. */
e.rotate_inputs_left (0, e.pred != PRED_none ? 4 : 3);
- icode = code_for_aarch64_sve (unspec, e.vector_mode (0));
+ icode = code_for_aarch64_sve (unspec, e.vector_mode (m_suffix_index));
}
else
- icode = INT_CODE (unspec, e.vector_mode (0));
+ icode = INT_CODE (unspec, e.vector_mode (m_suffix_index));
return e.use_exact_insn (icode);
}
};
@@ -385,16 +392,16 @@ public:
{
int unspec = unspec_for (e);
insn_code icode;
- if (e.type_suffix (0).float_p)
+ if (e.type_suffix (m_suffix_index).float_p)
{
/* Put the operands in the normal (fma ...) order, with the accumulator
last. This fits naturally since that's also the unprinted operand
in the asm output. */
e.rotate_inputs_left (0, e.pred != PRED_none ? 5 : 4);
- icode = code_for_aarch64_lane (unspec, e.vector_mode (0));
+ icode = code_for_aarch64_lane (unspec, e.vector_mode (m_suffix_index));
}
else
- icode = INT_CODE (unspec, e.vector_mode (0));
+ icode = INT_CODE (unspec, e.vector_mode (m_suffix_index));
return e.use_exact_insn (icode);
}
};
--
2.25.1
