On Sat, Nov 12, 2022 at 11:42 AM Jeff Law <jeffreya...@gmail.com> wrote: > ISTM that we'd need to strip the unspec and process its argument > instead.
I tried that first, the result was more ICEs because that pattern wasn't recognized at later stages. Then I read the change to the comment over the symbolic_operand predicate: https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=blobdiff;f=gcc/config/m68k/predicates.md;h=6ca261fb92a2b7ecd53a0356d06410e2c0d70965;hp=417989f6d6c408fa82af9f9649a204b9a754d1dc;hb=75df395f15f2;hpb=676fd528c9990a4f1046b51d40059893c3a71490 and that made me think that the intention was to not recognize the unspecs in that predicate. -- Thanks. -- Max
