It looks like there was some memory leak in the handling of attribute target_clones, introduced in 5928bc2ec06d .
Ok for trunk if testing passes? gcc/ChangeLog: * multiple_target.cc (expand_target_clones): Free memory. Signed-off-by: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <al...@gcc.gnu.org> --- gcc/multiple_target.cc | 12 ++++++++---- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/multiple_target.cc b/gcc/multiple_target.cc index 67866a7c963..77e0f21dd05 100644 --- a/gcc/multiple_target.cc +++ b/gcc/multiple_target.cc @@ -390,19 +390,23 @@ expand_target_clones (struct cgraph_node *node, bool definition) for (i = 0; i < attrnum; i++) { char *attr = attrs[i]; - char *suffix = XNEWVEC (char, strlen (attr) + 1); - create_new_asm_name (attr, suffix); /* Create new target clone. */ tree attributes = make_attribute ("target", attr, DECL_ATTRIBUTES (node->decl)); + char *suffix = XNEWVEC (char, strlen (attr) + 1); + create_new_asm_name (attr, suffix); cgraph_node *new_node = create_target_clone (node, definition, suffix, attributes); + XDELETEVEC (suffix); if (new_node == NULL) - return false; + { + XDELETEVEC (attrs); + XDELETEVEC (attr_str); + return false; + } new_node->local = false; - XDELETEVEC (suffix); decl2_v = new_node->function_version (); if (decl2_v != NULL) -- 2.38.1