On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 9:03 AM Kewen.Lin <li...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This is to fix the failure on powerpc as reported in PR106806,
> the test case requires tree ifcvt pass to perform on that loop,
> and it relies on masked_load support. The fix is to guard the
> expected scan with vect_masked_load effective target.
>
> As tested on powerpc64{,le}-linux-gnu and aarch64-linux-gnu
> (cfarm machine), the failures were gone. But on
> x86_64-redhat-linux (cfarm machine) the result becomes from
> PASS to N/A. I think it's expected since that machine doesn't
> support AVX by default so both check_avx_available and
> vect_masked_load fail, it should work fine on machines with
> default AVX support, or if we adjust the current
> check_avx_available with current_compiler_flags.
>
> Is it ok for trunk?
OK
> BR,
> Kewen
> -----
> PR testsuite/106806
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-34.c: Adjust with vect_masked_load
> effective target.
> ---
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-34.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-34.c
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-34.c
> index 41877e05efd..c2e5dfea35f 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-34.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-34.c
> @@ -13,4 +13,4 @@ float summul(int n, float *arg1, float *arg2)
> return res1;
> }
>
> -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 1 loops" 1 "vect" { target
> { ! { avr-*-* pru-*-* riscv*-*-* } } } } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 1 loops" 1 "vect" { target
> vect_masked_load } } } */
> --
> 2.27.0
