Re: [C11-atomic] [patch] gimple atomic statements

[Andrew MacLeod]

On 04/05/2012 05:14 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:

Ok.  I suppose having a GIMPLE_ATOMIC is fine then.

Thanks for all the feedback, I haven't really had to play in gimple land 
much lately. Some of those routines I guessed at what to do in order to 
get through initial compilation and your comments help clear those up 
too :-)

I will address everything next week since I doubt I will get to them 
before the long weekend arrives here.

Andrew