On 10/28/22 04:14, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
Hi!
This minor clean-up had fallen out of me working on something else in
GCC's options machinery, several months ago:
On 2019-03-12T18:14:04+0100, marxin <mli...@suse.cz> wrote:
gcc/lto/ChangeLog:
* lang.opt: Add new language LTODump and options related
to LTO dump tool.
As this new "Language" 'LTODump' does not share any options with 'LTO'
proper, it makes sense, in my opinion, to also make that obvious in
'gcc/lto/lang.opt', which your Subversion r270897 (Git
commit 66d62d9f2e6b059be6a018397fba555147133a9a) "Add lto-dump tool"
almost ;-) did:
--- a/gcc/lto/lang.opt
+++ b/gcc/lto/lang.opt
@@ -24,6 +24,9 @@
Language
LTO
+Language
+LTODump
+
Enum
Name(lto_linker_output) Type(enum lto_linker_output) UnknownError(unknown
linker output %qs)
@@ -66,6 +69,65 @@ fwpa=
LTO Driver RejectNegative Joined Var(flag_wpa)
Whole program analysis (WPA) mode with number of parallel jobs specified.
+
+[LTODump option records]
+
+
fresolution=
LTO Joined
The resolution file.
OK to push the attached
"Better separate 'LTO' vs. 'LTODump' in 'gcc/lto/lang.opt'"?
OK.
jeff
