On 10/27/22 22:23, Xi Ruoyao via Gcc-patches wrote:
On Thu, 2022-10-27 at 17:44 -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
though I don't have an opinion on whether libitm should be taking ports
to new targets, I'd never even heard of it before.
I asked this question to myself when I reviewed LoongArch libitm port.
But I remember one maintainer of Deepin (a distro) has complained that
some packages were depending on libitm (and/or libvtv).+++
I thought libitm had generic code to work if the target didn't provide
an implementation. But looking more closely I see that is not the
case. So yea, I guess cobbling together the most straightforward
implementation as possible makes sense.
Jeff
