> It is a bad idiom, given that we already had >= 10 __GNUC_MINOR__ and it > is possible we'll have 4.10 as well. > E.g. __GNUC_PREREQ macro in glibc shifts left major by 16, but even > multiplying by 100 instead of 10 is better.
OK, we'll change the idiom on mainline. -- Eric Botcazou
