On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 4:24 PM Iain Sandoe <idsan...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 14 Oct 2022, at 09:20, Hongtao Liu <crazy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 4:14 PM Iain Sandoe via Gcc-patches
> > <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Haochen
> >>
> >>> On 14 Oct 2022, at 08:54, Haochen Jiang via Gcc-patches 
> >>> <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>
> >>> These six patches aimed to add Intel Sierra Forest instructions, including
> >>> AVX-IFMA, AVX-VNNI0INT8, AVX-NE-CONVERT, CMPccXADD. We also added 
> >>> intrinsic
> >>> for vector __bf16 in this series of patch and Sierra Forest Support.
> >>>
> >>> The information is based on newly released
> >>> Intel Architecture Instruction Set Extensions and Future Features.
> >>>
> >>> The document comes following:
> >>> https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/develop/download/intel-architecture-instruction-set-extensions-programming-reference.html
> >>>
> >>> Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Ok for trunk?
> >>
> >> Have you tested that the testcases work on older platforms that do not 
> >> have support
> >> for the new instructions in their assemblers?
> >>
> >> I could not see any target-requires changes in the testcases .. hence my 
> >> question.
> >>
> > Guess you are looking at compile tests?
>
> yes, compile tests would need support from the assembler.
> >
> > For runtime test, we have add assembler check(target-requires changed)
> > plus runtime check(builtin_cpu_supports)
> > .i.e.
> >
> > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/avx-ifma-vpmaddhuq-2.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
> > +/* { dg-do run } */
> > +/* { dg-options "-O2 -mavxifma" } */
> > +/* { dg-require-effective-target avxifma } */
> >
> > Do I miss some?
>
> I would need to look at the sources after patching (perhaps they already have
> suitable target-requires that did not show up in the patch).
>
> Do you have this series as a branch somewhere that I can try on one of the
> like affected platforms?

Not yet.
Do we have any external place to put those patches so folks from the
community can validate before it's committed, HJ?

>
> Iain
>


-- 
BR,
Hongtao

Reply via email to