On 04/01/2012 12:38 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
I'm not sure it makes sense to propose it for gcc-4_6-branch. Jason/Ben, any opinions on PR 52796 and what should we do for gcc-4_6-branch?
Fixed. :) Jason
- [google] Work around PR52796 by replacing empty packs with... Jeffrey Yasskin
- Re: [google] Work around PR52796 by replacing empty p... Diego Novillo
- Re: [google] Work around PR52796 by replacing emp... Jason Merrill
- Re: [google] Work around PR52796 by replacing... Paolo Carlini
