Hi!

When not in explicit parallel/target/teams construct, we in some cases create
an artificial parallel with a single thread (either to handle target nowait
or for task reduction purposes).  In those cases, it handled again artificially
created implicit task (created by gomp_new_icv for cases where we needed to 
write
to some ICVs), but as the testcases show, didn't take into account possibility
of this being done from explicit task(s).  The code would destroy/free the 
previous
task and replace it with the new implicit task.  If task is an explicit task
(when teams is NULL, all explicit tasks behave like if (0)), it is a pointer to
a local stack variable, so freeing it doesn't work, and additionally we 
shouldn't
lose the explicit tasks - the new implicit task should instead replace the
ancestor task which is the first implicit one.

Regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, committed to trunk.
Will consider it for backporting later.

2022-10-12  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

        * task.c (gomp_create_artificial_team): Fix up handling of invocations
        from within explicit task.
        * target.c (GOMP_target_ext): Likewise.
        * testsuite/libgomp.c/task-7.c: New test.
        * testsuite/libgomp.c/task-8.c: New test.
        * testsuite/libgomp.c-c++-common/task-reduction-17.c: New test.
        * testsuite/libgomp.c-c++-common/task-reduction-18.c: New test.

--- libgomp/task.c.jj   2022-05-25 11:10:32.543261788 +0200
+++ libgomp/task.c      2022-10-12 16:49:03.342493229 +0200
@@ -2465,6 +2465,7 @@ gomp_create_artificial_team (void)
   struct gomp_task_icv *icv;
   struct gomp_team *team = gomp_new_team (1);
   struct gomp_task *task = thr->task;
+  struct gomp_task **implicit_task = &task;
   icv = task ? &task->icv : &gomp_global_icv;
   team->prev_ts = thr->ts;
   thr->ts.team = team;
@@ -2477,17 +2478,25 @@ gomp_create_artificial_team (void)
   thr->ts.static_trip = 0;
   thr->task = &team->implicit_task[0];
   gomp_init_task (thr->task, NULL, icv);
-  if (task)
+  while (*implicit_task
+        && (*implicit_task)->kind != GOMP_TASK_IMPLICIT)
+    implicit_task = &(*implicit_task)->parent;
+  if (*implicit_task)
     {
-      thr->task = task;
+      thr->task = *implicit_task;
       gomp_end_task ();
-      free (task);
+      free (*implicit_task);
       thr->task = &team->implicit_task[0];
     }
 #ifdef LIBGOMP_USE_PTHREADS
   else
     pthread_setspecific (gomp_thread_destructor, thr);
 #endif
+  if (implicit_task != &task)
+    {
+      *implicit_task = thr->task;
+      thr->task = task;
+    }
 }
 
 /* The format of data is:
--- libgomp/target.c.jj 2022-09-09 18:44:27.157255847 +0200
+++ libgomp/target.c    2022-10-12 16:43:33.531002003 +0200
@@ -2813,6 +2813,7 @@ GOMP_target_ext (int device, void (*fn)
        {
          struct gomp_team *team = gomp_new_team (1);
          struct gomp_task *task = thr->task;
+         struct gomp_task **implicit_task = &task;
          struct gomp_task_icv *icv = task ? &task->icv : &gomp_global_icv;
          team->prev_ts = thr->ts;
          thr->ts.team = team;
@@ -2825,15 +2826,23 @@ GOMP_target_ext (int device, void (*fn)
          thr->ts.static_trip = 0;
          thr->task = &team->implicit_task[0];
          gomp_init_task (thr->task, NULL, icv);
-         if (task)
+         while (*implicit_task
+                && (*implicit_task)->kind != GOMP_TASK_IMPLICIT)
+           implicit_task = &(*implicit_task)->parent;
+         if (*implicit_task)
            {
-             thr->task = task;
+             thr->task = *implicit_task;
              gomp_end_task ();
-             free (task);
+             free (*implicit_task);
              thr->task = &team->implicit_task[0];
            }
          else
            pthread_setspecific (gomp_thread_destructor, thr);
+         if (implicit_task != &task)
+           {
+             *implicit_task = thr->task;
+             thr->task = task;
+           }
        }
       if (thr->ts.team
          && !thr->task->final_task)
--- libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c/task-7.c.jj     2022-10-12 15:41:25.488494296 
+0200
+++ libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c/task-7.c        2022-10-12 16:03:32.881612519 
+0200
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+/* { dg-do run } */
+
+#include <omp.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+
+int
+main ()
+{
+  #pragma omp task final (1)
+  {
+    if (!omp_in_final ())
+      abort ();
+    #pragma omp task
+    {
+      if (!omp_in_final ())
+       abort ();
+      #pragma omp target nowait
+      if (omp_in_final ())
+       abort ();
+      if (!omp_in_final ())
+       abort ();
+      #pragma omp taskwait
+    }
+  }
+  return 0;
+}
--- libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c/task-8.c.jj     2022-10-12 16:06:38.889097404 
+0200
+++ libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c/task-8.c        2022-10-12 16:07:19.568545781 
+0200
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+/* { dg-do run } */
+
+int
+main ()
+{
+  int i = 0;
+  #pragma omp task
+  {
+    #pragma omp target nowait private (i)
+    i = 1;
+    #pragma omp taskwait
+  }
+  return 0;
+}
--- libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c-c++-common/task-reduction-17.c.jj       
2022-10-12 17:03:31.760628526 +0200
+++ libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c-c++-common/task-reduction-17.c  2022-10-12 
17:08:09.225839917 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+/* { dg-do run } */
+
+#include <omp.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+
+int a;
+
+int
+main ()
+{
+  #pragma omp task final (1)
+  {
+    if (!omp_in_final ())
+      abort ();
+    #pragma omp task
+    {
+      if (!omp_in_final ())
+       abort ();
+      #pragma omp taskgroup task_reduction (+: a)
+      {
+       if (!omp_in_final ())
+         abort ();
+       #pragma omp task in_reduction (+: a)
+       {
+         ++a;
+         if (!omp_in_final ())
+           abort ();
+       }
+      }
+      if (!omp_in_final ())
+       abort ();
+      #pragma omp taskwait
+    }
+  }
+  return 0;
+}
--- libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c-c++-common/task-reduction-18.c.jj       
2022-10-12 17:08:36.737464280 +0200
+++ libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c-c++-common/task-reduction-18.c  2022-10-12 
17:09:40.776589861 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+/* { dg-do run } */
+
+int a;
+
+int
+main ()
+{
+  #pragma omp task
+  {
+    #pragma omp taskgroup task_reduction (+: a)
+    {
+      #pragma omp task in_reduction (+: a)
+      ++a;
+    }
+  }
+  return 0;
+}

        Jakub

Reply via email to