Hi Jason > On 11 Oct 2022, at 23:06, Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 10/11/22 17:58, Iain Sandoe wrote: >> Tested on x86_64-darwin19, OK for master? >> thanks >> Iain >> -- >8 -- >> Now we have the TARGET_EXPR_ELIDING_P flag, it is important to ensure it >> is set properly on target exprs. The code here has a mixture of APIs used >> to build inits. This patch changes that to use cp_build_init_expr() where >> possible, since that handles setting the flag. > > Hmm, I wouldn't expect this to be necessary, since cp_build_modify_expr calls > cp_build_init_expr for INIT_EXPR.
It seems that path is only taken if the init is a CONSTRUCTOR. > Perhaps the similarity of the function names is a trap... not sure exactly what trap you mean. It seems that on my local set of additional tests (for some of the open prs) there are some progressions from this change, I will have to track down which change is the cause. thanks Iain > >> --- >> gcc/cp/coroutines.cc | 25 ++++++++----------------- >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) >> diff --git a/gcc/cp/coroutines.cc b/gcc/cp/coroutines.cc >> index 01a3e831ee5..20d309445eb 100644 >> --- a/gcc/cp/coroutines.cc >> +++ b/gcc/cp/coroutines.cc >> @@ -1025,8 +1025,7 @@ build_co_await (location_t loc, tree a, >> suspend_point_kind suspend_kind) >> else >> { >> e_proxy = get_awaitable_var (suspend_kind, o_type); >> - o = cp_build_modify_expr (loc, e_proxy, INIT_EXPR, o, >> - tf_warning_or_error); >> + o = cp_build_init_expr (loc, e_proxy, o); >> } >> /* I suppose we could check that this is contextually convertible to >> bool. */ >> @@ -2889,8 +2888,7 @@ flatten_await_stmt (var_nest_node *n, hash_set<tree> >> *promoted, >> gcc_checking_assert (!already_present); >> tree inner = TREE_OPERAND (init, 1); >> gcc_checking_assert (TREE_CODE (inner) != COND_EXPR); >> - init = cp_build_modify_expr (input_location, var, INIT_EXPR, init, >> - tf_warning_or_error); >> + init = cp_build_init_expr (var, init); >> /* Simplify for the case that we have an init containing the temp >> alone. */ >> if (t == n->init && n->var == NULL_TREE) >> @@ -3656,8 +3654,7 @@ await_statement_walker (tree *stmt, int *do_subtree, >> void *d) >> if (TREE_CODE (cond_inner) == CLEANUP_POINT_EXPR) >> cond_inner = TREE_OPERAND (cond_inner, 0); >> location_t sloc = EXPR_LOCATION (SWITCH_STMT_COND (sw_stmt)); >> - tree new_s = cp_build_init_expr (sloc, newvar, >> - cond_inner); >> + tree new_s = cp_build_init_expr (sloc, newvar, cond_inner); >> finish_expr_stmt (new_s); >> SWITCH_STMT_COND (sw_stmt) = newvar; >> /* Now add the switch statement with the condition re- >> @@ -4902,9 +4899,8 @@ morph_fn_to_coro (tree orig, tree *resumer, tree >> *destroyer) >> if (flag_exceptions) >> { >> /* This var is now live. */ >> - r = build_modify_expr (fn_start, parm.guard_var, >> - boolean_type_node, INIT_EXPR, fn_start, >> - boolean_true_node, boolean_type_node); >> + r = cp_build_init_expr (fn_start, parm.guard_var, >> + boolean_true_node); >> finish_expr_stmt (r); >> } >> } >> @@ -4948,9 +4944,7 @@ morph_fn_to_coro (tree orig, tree *resumer, tree >> *destroyer) >> r = coro_build_cvt_void_expr_stmt (r, fn_start); >> finish_expr_stmt (r); >> - r = build_modify_expr (fn_start, coro_promise_live, >> boolean_type_node, >> - INIT_EXPR, fn_start, boolean_true_node, >> - boolean_type_node); >> + r = cp_build_init_expr (fn_start, coro_promise_live, >> boolean_true_node); >> finish_expr_stmt (r); >> promise_dtor >> @@ -5031,8 +5025,7 @@ morph_fn_to_coro (tree orig, tree *resumer, tree >> *destroyer) >> NULL_TREE); >> add_decl_expr (gro); >> gro_bind_vars = gro; >> - r = cp_build_modify_expr (input_location, gro, INIT_EXPR, get_ro, >> - tf_warning_or_error); >> + r = cp_build_init_expr (gro, get_ro); >> /* The constructed object might require a cleanup. */ >> if (TYPE_HAS_NONTRIVIAL_DESTRUCTOR (gro_type)) >> { >> @@ -5053,9 +5046,7 @@ morph_fn_to_coro (tree orig, tree *resumer, tree >> *destroyer) >> cleanup. */ >> if (gro_ret_dtor) >> { >> - r = build_modify_expr (fn_start, coro_gro_live, boolean_type_node, >> - INIT_EXPR, fn_start, boolean_true_node, >> - boolean_type_node); >> + r = cp_build_init_expr (fn_start, coro_gro_live, boolean_true_node); >> finish_expr_stmt (r); >> } >> /* Initialize the resume_idx_var to 0, meaning "not started". */ >