The bug was introduced in f30e9fd33e56a5a721346ea6140722e1b193db42.
A variable (cur_locus_e) was incorrectly declared inside a loop.
I also moved two other declarations (last and locus) down to make
the code more clear.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR debug/107193
* tree-cfg.cc (assign_discriminators): Move declaration of cur_locus_e
out of the loop.
---
gcc/tree-cfg.cc | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/tree-cfg.cc b/gcc/tree-cfg.cc
index 41f2925665f..ae781871a19 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-cfg.cc
+++ b/gcc/tree-cfg.cc
@@ -1204,9 +1204,8 @@ assign_discriminators (void)
edge e;
edge_iterator ei;
gimple_stmt_iterator gsi;
- gimple *last = last_stmt (bb);
- location_t locus = last ? gimple_location (last) : UNKNOWN_LOCATION;
location_t curr_locus = UNKNOWN_LOCATION;
+ expanded_location curr_locus_e = {};
int curr_discr = 0;
/* Traverse the basic block, if two function calls within a basic block
@@ -1215,7 +1214,7 @@ assign_discriminators (void)
for (gsi = gsi_start_bb (bb); !gsi_end_p (gsi); gsi_next (&gsi))
{
gimple *stmt = gsi_stmt (gsi);
- expanded_location curr_locus_e;
+
if (curr_locus == UNKNOWN_LOCATION)
{
curr_locus = gimple_location (stmt);
@@ -1238,6 +1237,8 @@ assign_discriminators (void)
curr_discr = next_discriminator_for_locus (curr_locus);
}
+ gimple *last = last_stmt (bb);
+ location_t locus = last ? gimple_location (last) : UNKNOWN_LOCATION;
if (locus == UNKNOWN_LOCATION)
continue;
--
2.25.1
