According to grokbitfield, DECL_BITFIELD_REPRESENTATIVE may "temporarily"
contain the width of the bitfield until we layout the class type (after
which it'll contain a FIELD_DECL). But for a class template, it'll always
be the width since we don't/can't layout dependent types.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk?
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* module.cc (trees_out::mark_class_def): Guard against
DECL_BITFIELD_REPRESENTATIVE not being a decl.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/modules/bfield-3.H: New test.
---
gcc/cp/module.cc | 3 ++-
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/bfield-3.H | 8 ++++++++
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/bfield-3.H
diff --git a/gcc/cp/module.cc b/gcc/cp/module.cc
index cb1929bc5d5..172a72e92b9 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/module.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/module.cc
@@ -11919,7 +11919,8 @@ trees_out::mark_class_def (tree defn)
mark_class_member (member);
if (TREE_CODE (member) == FIELD_DECL)
if (tree repr = DECL_BIT_FIELD_REPRESENTATIVE (member))
- mark_declaration (repr, false);
+ if (DECL_P (repr))
+ mark_declaration (repr, false);
}
/* Mark the binfo hierarchy. */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/bfield-3.H
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/bfield-3.H
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..4fd4db7116a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/bfield-3.H
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+// { dg-additional-options -fmodule-header }
+// { dg-module-cmi {} }
+
+template<int N>
+struct A {
+ int x : 1;
+ int y : N;
+};
--
2.38.0.rc2
