On 04/03/2012 05:09 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote: > On 03/04/12 12:01, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 11:45:30AM +0100, Richard Earnshaw wrote: >>> If, so then there's only one way to sort out this mess. >>> >>> /lib/arm-linux-gnueabi/ld-linux.so.3 Location of soft-float loader >>> /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/ld-linux.so.3 Location of hard-float loader >> >> The above scheme is a Debianism which no other distro is using. >> >> Jakub >> > > Not really, it's just a naming convention for where the config-specific > dynamic loader lives. It doesn't affect where the remaining shared > libraries live. > > The subdirectories could be called fred and jim and it would still work. > The only thing required is that this part of the naming scheme be > agreed amongst the distros. > > This looks to me like it's turning into a bike-shed painting excerise > between the distros out there. That's really sad.
I don't think we ever even had the discussion: Debian invented their Debian-internal scheme for managing multiple ABIs. They have in the past used patched versions of gcc, as in the case of x86_64. Andrew.
