On 10/6/22 10:49, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 08:25:29PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 10/5/22 17:27, Marek Polacek wrote:
This PR reports that

    struct Base {};
    struct Derived : Base {};
    static_assert(__reference_constructs_from_temporary(Base const&, Derived));

doesn't pass, which it should: it's just like

    const Base& b(Derived{});

where we bind 'b' to the Base subobject of a temporary object of type
Derived.  The ck_base conversion didn't have ->need_temporary_p set because
we didn't need to create a temporary object just for the base, but the whole
object is a temporary so we're still binding to a temporary.  Fixed by
the conv_is_prvalue hunk.

That broke a bunch of tests.  I've distilled the issue into a simple test
in elision4.C.  Essentially, we have

    struct B { /* ... */ };
    struct D : B { };
    B b = D();

and we set force_elide in build_over_call, but we're unable to actually
elide the B::B(B&&) call, and crash on gcc_assert (!force_elide);.

<https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/copy_elision> says that copy
elision "can only apply when the object being initialized is known not to be
a potentially-overlapping subobject".  So I suppose we shouldn't force_elide
the B::B(B&&) call.  I don't belive the CWG 2327 code was added to handle
derived-to-base conversions, at that time conv_binds_ref_to_prvalue wasn't
checking ck_base at all.

Does that make sense?  If so...

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?

        PR c++/107085

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

        * call.cc (conv_is_prvalue): Return true if the base subobject is part
        of a temporary object.

No, the base subobject of a prvalue is an xvalue.

Ah, so this is just like T().m where T() is a prvalue but the whole thing
is an xvalue.  Duly noted.

Exactly.

I think the problem is that an expression being a prvalue is a subset of
binding a reference to a temporary, and we shouldn't try to express both of
those using the same function: you need a separate
conv_binds_ref_to_temporary.

Ack, so how about this?  Thanks,

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?

-- >8 --
This PR reports that

   struct Base {};
   struct Derived : Base {};
   static_assert(__reference_constructs_from_temporary(Base const&, Derived));

doesn't pass, which it should: it's just like

   const Base& b(Derived{});

where we bind 'b' to the Base subobject of a temporary object of type
Derived.  The ck_base conversion didn't have ->need_temporary_p set because
we didn't need to create a temporary object just for the base, but the whole
object is a temporary so we're still binding to a temporary.  Since the
Base subobject is an xvalue, a new function is introduced.

        PR c++/107085

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

        * call.cc (conv_binds_ref_to_temporary): New.
        (ref_conv_binds_directly): Use it.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        * g++.dg/ext/reference_constructs_from_temporary1.C: Adjust expected
        result.
        * g++.dg/ext/reference_converts_from_temporary1.C: Likewise.
        * g++.dg/cpp0x/elision4.C: New test.
---
  gcc/cp/call.cc                                | 23 ++++++++++++++++++-
  gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/elision4.C         | 15 ++++++++++++
  .../reference_constructs_from_temporary1.C    |  2 +-
  .../ext/reference_converts_from_temporary1.C  |  2 +-
  4 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/elision4.C

diff --git a/gcc/cp/call.cc b/gcc/cp/call.cc
index bd04a1d309a..715a83f5a69 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/call.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/call.cc
@@ -9210,6 +9210,27 @@ conv_binds_ref_to_prvalue (conversion *c)
    return conv_is_prvalue (next_conversion (c));
  }
+/* True iff C is a conversion that binds a reference to a temporary.
+   This is a superset of conv_binds_ref_to_prvalue: here we're also
+   interested in xvalues.  */
+
+static bool
+conv_binds_ref_to_temporary (conversion *c)
+{
+  if (conv_binds_ref_to_prvalue (c))
+    return true;
+  if (c->kind != ck_ref_bind)
+    return false;
+  c = next_conversion (c);
+  /* This is the case for
+       struct Base {};
+       struct Derived : Base {};
+       const Base& b(Derived{});
+     where we bind 'b' to the Base subobject of a temporary object of type
+     Derived.  The subobject is an xvalue; the whole object is a prvalue.  */
+  return (c->kind == ck_base && conv_is_prvalue (next_conversion (c)));

I think you also want to check for the case of c->u.expr being a COMPONENT_REF/ARRAY_REF around a TARGET_EXPR, as you mentioned.

+}
+
  /* Return tristate::TS_TRUE if converting EXPR to a reference type TYPE does
     not involve creating a temporary.  Return tristate::TS_FALSE if converting
     EXPR to a reference type TYPE binds the reference to a temporary.  If the
@@ -9230,7 +9251,7 @@ ref_conv_binds_directly (tree type, tree expr, bool 
direct_init_p /*= false*/)
                                          /*c_cast_p=*/false, flags, tf_none);
    tristate ret (tristate::TS_UNKNOWN);
    if (conv && !conv->bad_p)
-    ret = tristate (!conv_binds_ref_to_prvalue (conv));
+    ret = tristate (!conv_binds_ref_to_temporary (conv));
/* Free all the conversions we allocated. */
    obstack_free (&conversion_obstack, p);
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/elision4.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/elision4.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..3cc2e3afa5d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/elision4.C
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+// PR c++/107085
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+struct X {
+  X();
+  X(X&&);
+};
+struct Z : X {};
+X x1 = Z();
+X x2 = X(Z());
+
+struct B { };
+struct D : B { };
+B b1 = D();
+B b2 = B(D());
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/reference_constructs_from_temporary1.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/reference_constructs_from_temporary1.C
index 76de905a35d..5354b1dc4e6 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/reference_constructs_from_temporary1.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/reference_constructs_from_temporary1.C
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ SA(!__reference_constructs_from_temporary(const int&, H));
  SA(!__reference_constructs_from_temporary(int&&, G2));
  SA(!__reference_constructs_from_temporary(const int&, H2));
-SA(!__reference_constructs_from_temporary(const Base&, Der));
+SA(__reference_constructs_from_temporary(const Base&, Der));
// This fails because std::is_constructible_v<int&&, id<int[3]>> is false.
  SA(!__reference_constructs_from_temporary(int&&, id<int[3]>));
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/reference_converts_from_temporary1.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/reference_converts_from_temporary1.C
index 90196c38742..e6c159e9b00 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/reference_converts_from_temporary1.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/reference_converts_from_temporary1.C
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ SA( __reference_converts_from_temporary(const int&, H));
  SA(!__reference_converts_from_temporary(int&&, G2));
  SA(!__reference_converts_from_temporary(const int&, H2));
-SA(!__reference_converts_from_temporary(const Base&, Der));
+SA(__reference_converts_from_temporary(const Base&, Der));
// This fails because std::is_constructible_v<int&&, id<int[3]>> is false.
  SA(!__reference_converts_from_temporary(int&&, id<int[3]>));

base-commit: 3ec926d36fbf7cb3ff45759471139f3a71d1c4de

Reply via email to