When getting the name of an attribute, we ought to use get_attribute_name, which handles both [[ ]] and __attribute__(()) forms. Failure to do so may result in an ICE, like here.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk? PR c++/106937 gcc/c-family/ChangeLog: * c-pretty-print.cc (pp_c_attributes): Use get_attribute_name. (pp_c_attributes_display): Likewise. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gcc.dg/fcf-protection-1.c: New test. --- gcc/c-family/c-pretty-print.cc | 8 ++++---- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fcf-protection-1.c | 13 +++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fcf-protection-1.c diff --git a/gcc/c-family/c-pretty-print.cc b/gcc/c-family/c-pretty-print.cc index efa1768f4d6..91f88b830e3 100644 --- a/gcc/c-family/c-pretty-print.cc +++ b/gcc/c-family/c-pretty-print.cc @@ -863,7 +863,7 @@ pp_c_attributes (c_pretty_printer *pp, tree attributes) pp_c_left_paren (pp); for (; attributes != NULL_TREE; attributes = TREE_CHAIN (attributes)) { - pp_tree_identifier (pp, TREE_PURPOSE (attributes)); + pp_tree_identifier (pp, get_attribute_name (attributes)); if (TREE_VALUE (attributes)) pp_c_call_argument_list (pp, TREE_VALUE (attributes)); @@ -875,7 +875,7 @@ pp_c_attributes (c_pretty_printer *pp, tree attributes) } /* Pretty-print ATTRIBUTES using GNU C extension syntax for attributes - marked to be displayed on disgnostic. */ + marked to be displayed on diagnostic. */ void pp_c_attributes_display (c_pretty_printer *pp, tree a) @@ -888,7 +888,7 @@ pp_c_attributes_display (c_pretty_printer *pp, tree a) for (; a != NULL_TREE; a = TREE_CHAIN (a)) { const struct attribute_spec *as; - as = lookup_attribute_spec (TREE_PURPOSE (a)); + as = lookup_attribute_spec (get_attribute_name (a)); if (!as || as->affects_type_identity == false) continue; if (c_dialect_cxx () @@ -906,7 +906,7 @@ pp_c_attributes_display (c_pretty_printer *pp, tree a) { pp_separate_with (pp, ','); } - pp_tree_identifier (pp, TREE_PURPOSE (a)); + pp_tree_identifier (pp, get_attribute_name (a)); if (TREE_VALUE (a)) pp_c_call_argument_list (pp, TREE_VALUE (a)); } diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fcf-protection-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fcf-protection-1.c new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9d06feadfd1 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fcf-protection-1.c @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +/* PR c++/106937 */ +/* { dg-options "-fcf-protection -w" } */ + +[[gnu::nocf_check]] typedef void (*FuncPointerWithNoCfCheck)(void); +typedef void (*FuncPointer)(void); +[[gnu::nocf_check]] void testNoCfCheck(); +void testNoCfCheck(){}; +int [[gnu::nocf_check]] i; +void testNoCfCheckImpl(double i [[gnu::nocf_check]]) {} +void testNoCfCheckMismatch(FuncPointer f) { + FuncPointerWithNoCfCheck fNoCfCheck = f; + (*fNoCfCheck)(); +} base-commit: c2ee70f20de8133a88553270073226b0f3f55f62 -- 2.37.3