> On 29 Sep 2022, at 00:04, Iain Sandoe <i...@sandoe.co.uk> wrote: > > adding —with-tune=G5 to the configure line .. the cross-build then succeeded > (at "-O1 -g" as I was building to debug) - maybe that will provide a clue, > but I’m > out of time for today. perhaps we also need a check that the m32 CPU has support for 64b insns? so perhaps —with-cpu-32=<G5, 970…> (or the moral equivalent) should be required? Iain
- Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Rework option -... Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches
- Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Rework opti... Iain Sandoe
- Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Rework... Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches
- Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Re... Iain Sandoe
- Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Rework... Segher Boessenkool
- Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Re... Iain Sandoe
- Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Re... Segher Boessenkool
- Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Rework opti... Segher Boessenkool
- Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Rework option -mpow... Segher Boessenkool
- Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Rework option -... Iain Sandoe
- Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Rework opti... Iain Sandoe
- Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Rework... Segher Boessenkool
- Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Rework opti... Segher Boessenkool
- Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Rework... Iain Sandoe
- Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Re... Segher Boessenkool
- Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Rework option -mpowerpc64 ha... Segher Boessenkool
- Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Rework option -mpowerpc... Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches
- Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Rework option -mpow... Segher Boessenkool