Hi,

On 9/23/22 19:24, Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches wrote:
Torbjörn SVENSSON via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
In the test cases, it's clearly written that intrinsics is not
implemented on arm*. A simple xfail does not help since there are
link error and that would cause an UNRESOLVED testcase rather than
XFAIL.
By changing to dg-skip-if, the entire test case is omitted.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        * gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x2.c: Replace
        dg-xfail-if with gd-skip-if.


Since Kyrill explicitly added the dg-xfail for arm in r8-6382-gda1f8d7f12c2ef , I am not sure he is OK with making the failure disappear?

Christophe

Typo: s/gd/dg/

OK with that change, thanks.

Richard

        * gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x3.c: Likewise.
        * gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x4.c: Likewise.

Co-Authored-By: Yvan ROUX  <yvan.r...@foss.st.com>
Signed-off-by: Torbjörn SVENSSON  <torbjorn.svens...@foss.st.com>
---
  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x2.c | 2 +-
  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x3.c | 2 +-
  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x4.c | 2 +-
  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x2.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x2.c
index 92a139bc523..f933102be47 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x2.c
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
  /* We haven't implemented these intrinsics for arm yet.  */
-/* { dg-xfail-if "" { arm*-*-* } } */
  /* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "unsupported" { arm*-*-* } } */
  /* { dg-options "-O3" } */
#include <arm_neon.h>
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x3.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x3.c
index 6ddd507d9cf..b20dec061b5 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x3.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x3.c
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
  /* We haven't implemented these intrinsics for arm yet.  */
-/* { dg-xfail-if "" { arm*-*-* } } */
  /* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "unsupported" { arm*-*-* } } */
  /* { dg-options "-O3" } */
#include <arm_neon.h>
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x4.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x4.c
index 451a0afc6aa..e59f845880e 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x4.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x4.c
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
  /* We haven't implemented these intrinsics for arm yet.  */
-/* { dg-xfail-if "" { arm*-*-* } } */
  /* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "unsupported" { arm*-*-* } } */
  /* { dg-options "-O3" } */
#include <arm_neon.h>

Reply via email to