After moving the testglue in commit 9d503515cee, the jump to exit and
abort is too far for the 'b' instruction on Cortex-M0. As most of the
C code would generate a 'bl' instruction instead of a 'b'
instruction, lets do the same for the inline assembler.
The error seen without this patch:
/tmp/cccCRiCl.o: in function `main':
stack-protector-1.c:(.text+0x4e): relocation truncated to fit: R_ARM_THM_JUMP11
against symbol `__wrap_exit' defined in .text section in gcc_tg.o
stack-protector-1.c:(.text+0x50): relocation truncated to fit: R_ARM_THM_JUMP11
against symbol `__wrap_abort' defined in .text section in gcc_tg.o
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/stack-protector-1.c: Use 'bl'
instead of 'b' instruction.
* gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/stack-protector-3.c: Likewise.
Co-Authored-By: Yvan ROUX <yvan.r...@foss.st.com>
Signed-off-by: Torbjörn SVENSSON <torbjorn.svens...@foss.st.com>
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/stack-protector-1.c | 4 ++--
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/stack-protector-3.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/stack-protector-1.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/stack-protector-1.c
index 8d28b0a847c..3f0ffc9c3f3 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/stack-protector-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/stack-protector-1.c
@@ -56,8 +56,8 @@ asm (
" ldr r1, [sp, #4]\n"
CHECK (r1)
" mov r0, #0\n"
-" b exit\n"
+" bl exit\n"
"1:\n"
-" b abort\n"
+" bl abort\n"
" .size main, .-main"
);
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/stack-protector-3.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/stack-protector-3.c
index b8f77fa2309..2f710529b8f 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/stack-protector-3.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/stack-protector-3.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ asm (
" .type __stack_chk_fail, %function\n"
"__stack_chk_fail:\n"
" movs r0, #0\n"
-" b exit\n"
+" bl exit\n"
" .size __stack_chk_fail, .-__stack_chk_fail"
);
--
2.25.1
