On 03/30/2012 12:37 PM, Michael Matz wrote: > Not yet regstrapped, so no rfa, but does this seem sane?
It definitely seems plausible. I can't immediately think of anything you might have forgotten. r~
On 03/30/2012 12:37 PM, Michael Matz wrote: > Not yet regstrapped, so no rfa, but does this seem sane?
It definitely seems plausible. I can't immediately think of anything you might have forgotten. r~