On 9/8/22 18:23, Jason Merrill wrote:
> It seems to me that the warning is pointing out that comparing the address of
> the array is nonsensical, and we should remove it and just have the memcmp.
Yes, thanks for the pointer. We should always compare the array types with
memcmp.
Ready to be installed?
Thanks,
Martin
From 32e875bf395ebb0444ced281c5e7634474100fb8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Martin Liska <mli...@suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2022 20:00:33 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] opts: always compare array option values with memcmp
gcc/ChangeLog:
* optc-save-gen.awk: Always compare array option values with memcmp.
---
gcc/optc-save-gen.awk | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/optc-save-gen.awk b/gcc/optc-save-gen.awk
index 233d1fbb637..49065ced0b3 100644
--- a/gcc/optc-save-gen.awk
+++ b/gcc/optc-save-gen.awk
@@ -1093,8 +1093,7 @@ for (i = 0; i < n_target_array; i++) {
name = var_target_array[i]
size = var_target_array_size[i]
type = var_target_array_type[i]
- print " if (ptr1->" name" != ptr2->" name "";
- print " || memcmp (ptr1->" name ", ptr2->" name ", " size " * sizeof(" type ")))"
+ print " if (memcmp (ptr1->" name ", ptr2->" name ", " size " * sizeof(" type ")))"
print " return false;";
}
for (i = 0; i < n_target_val; i++) {
--
2.37.3
