The following fixes an oversight in the last change to compute_control_dep_chain where we have to return whether we found a chain.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, pushed. PR tree-optimization/106844 * gimple-predicate-analysis.cc (compute_control_dep_chain): Return whether we found a chain. * gcc.dg/pr106844.c: New testcase. --- gcc/gimple-predicate-analysis.cc | 2 +- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr106844.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr106844.c diff --git a/gcc/gimple-predicate-analysis.cc b/gcc/gimple-predicate-analysis.cc index 681047deee7..ef2906ebc51 100644 --- a/gcc/gimple-predicate-analysis.cc +++ b/gcc/gimple-predicate-analysis.cc @@ -1077,7 +1077,7 @@ compute_control_dep_chain (basic_block dom_bb, const_basic_block dep_bb, if (dump_file) fprintf (dump_file, "param_uninit_control_dep_attempts " "exceeded: %u\n", *num_calls); - return false; + break; } ++*num_calls; diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr106844.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr106844.c new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..df68d76f257 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr106844.c @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-options "-O -Wuninitialized --param uninit-control-dep-attempts=1" } */ + +struct { + int count; + int array[8]; +} fde_merge_v1; + +void +fde_merge_i2() { + unsigned i1; + do + while (i1 && fde_merge_v1.array[i1 - 1]) /* { dg-warning "uninitialized" } */ + i1--; + while (fde_merge_i2); +} -- 2.35.3