On Sun, 2022-09-04 at 11:22 +0800, Lulu Cheng wrote: > > 在 2022/9/4 上午10:51, Xi Ruoyao 写道: > > > On Sun, 2022-09-04 at 10:26 +0800, Lulu Cheng wrote: > > > > > If the above modifications are not added, the function call is: > > > > > > bl %plt(test1) > > > > > > now is : > > > > > > bl test1 > > Regarding "%plt(...)", in the binutils code: > > > > /* For compatible old asm code. */ > > if (0 == strcmp (op_c_str, "plt")) > > btype = BFD_RELOC_LARCH_B26; > > > > Link: > > https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=blob;f=gas/config/loongarch-parse.y;h=8704687706df50aa15aff05f97e4560d7ec6fa23;hb=refs/heads/master#l131 > > > > Zhensong: does "old asm code" here mean we should remove %plt from > > "new" > > assembly code, i. e. stop to print %plt(...) in GCC completely? > > > > I think '%plt' also needs to be removed from the readability of the > assembly code.:-\
I understand, but maybe we should remove %plt unconditionally, with or without -mdirect-extern-access. Note that for -mcmodel=medium we don't say something like "%pc_hi20(%plt(x))" either. -- Xi Ruoyao <xry...@xry111.site> School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University
