On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 10:20:45AM +0000, Richard Biener wrote:
> So
> 
>    combined_fn cfn = builtin_cfn_unreachable ();
>    gimple_build (&gsi, false, GSI_NEW_STMT, cfn, void_type_node);
> 
> ?

So what about just using existing call that creates the GIMPLE call,
whether it is builtin call or internal call?
I didn't use that initially because the code then wants to add a cgraph
edge for the fndecl, but in fact it is quite easy to gimple_call_fndecl
afterwards:

2022-08-25  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

        PR tree-optimization/106099
        * internal-fn.def (TRAP): Add ECF_LOOPING_CONST_OR_PURE flag.
        * tree-cfg.cc (execute_fixup_cfg): Add IFN_TRAP instead of
        __builtin_trap to avoid the need of vops.

        * gcc.dg/pr106099.c: New test.

--- gcc/internal-fn.def.jj      2022-07-28 12:43:12.876295553 +0200
+++ gcc/internal-fn.def 2022-08-23 14:21:49.559364691 +0200
@@ -458,7 +458,8 @@ DEF_INTERNAL_FN (SPACESHIP, ECF_CONST |
 
 /* __builtin_trap created from/for __builtin_unreachable.  */
 DEF_INTERNAL_FN (TRAP, ECF_CONST | ECF_LEAF | ECF_NORETURN
-                      | ECF_NOTHROW | ECF_COLD, NULL)
+                      | ECF_NOTHROW | ECF_COLD | ECF_LOOPING_CONST_OR_PURE,
+                NULL)
 
 #undef DEF_INTERNAL_INT_FN
 #undef DEF_INTERNAL_FLT_FN
--- gcc/tree-cfg.cc.jj  2022-07-26 10:32:23.998267698 +0200
+++ gcc/tree-cfg.cc     2022-08-25 09:42:19.013039869 +0200
@@ -9878,16 +9878,16 @@ execute_fixup_cfg (void)
            {
              if (stmt && is_gimple_call (stmt))
                gimple_call_set_ctrl_altering (stmt, false);
-             tree fndecl = builtin_decl_unreachable ();
-             stmt = gimple_build_call (fndecl, 0);
+             stmt = gimple_build_builtin_unreachable (UNKNOWN_LOCATION);
              gimple_stmt_iterator gsi = gsi_last_bb (bb);
              gsi_insert_after (&gsi, stmt, GSI_NEW_STMT);
              if (!cfun->after_inlining)
-               {
-                 gcall *call_stmt = dyn_cast <gcall *> (stmt);
-                 node->create_edge (cgraph_node::get_create (fndecl),
-                                    call_stmt, bb->count);
-               }
+               if (tree fndecl = gimple_call_fndecl (stmt))
+                 {
+                   gcall *call_stmt = dyn_cast <gcall *> (stmt);
+                   node->create_edge (cgraph_node::get_create (fndecl),
+                                      call_stmt, bb->count);
+                 }
            }
        }
     }
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr106099.c.jj  2022-08-23 14:30:51.992057144 +0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr106099.c     2022-08-23 14:29:04.271508337 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+/* PR tree-optimization/106099 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O -fharden-compares -fno-tree-forwprop -fno-tree-ch 
-fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-ccp -funreachable-traps 
--param=scev-max-expr-size=1" } */
+
+void
+foo (void)
+{
+  for (unsigned i = 0; i == 0; i++)
+    __builtin_printf ("%d", i);
+}

        Jakub

Reply via email to