On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 12:33 PM Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Mon, 22 Aug 2022 at 19:15, Will Hawkins wrote: > > > > Until now operator+(char*, string) and operator+(string, char*) had > > different performance characteristics. The former required a single > > memory allocation and the latter required two. This patch makes the > > performance equal. > > If you don't have a GCC copyright assignment on file with the FSF then > please follow the procedure described at https://gcc.gnu.org/dco.html
Thank you. > > > > libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog: > > * libstdc++-v3/include/bits/basic_string.h (operator+(string, > > char*)): > > Remove naive implementation. > > * libstdc++-v3/include/bits/basic_string.tcc (operator+(string, > > char*)): > > Add single-allocation implementation. > > --- > > libstdc++-v3/include/bits/basic_string.h | 7 +------ > > libstdc++-v3/include/bits/basic_string.tcc | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/basic_string.h > > b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/basic_string.h > > index b04fba95678..bc048fc0689 100644 > > --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/basic_string.h > > +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/basic_string.h > > @@ -3523,12 +3523,7 @@ _GLIBCXX_END_NAMESPACE_CXX11 > > _GLIBCXX20_CONSTEXPR > > inline basic_string<_CharT, _Traits, _Alloc> > > Please remove the 'inline' specifier here, since you're moving the > definition into the non-inline .tcc file. > > There's a separate discussion to be had about whether these operator+ > overloads *should* be inline. But for the purposes of this change, we > want these two operator+ overloads to be consistent, and so they > should both be non-inline. Thank you for the feedback. I sent out a v2 of the patch. Again, I hope that I followed the proper procedure by having my mailer put the patch in reply to my previous message. Thank you again! Will > > > operator+(const basic_string<_CharT, _Traits, _Alloc>& __lhs, > > - const _CharT* __rhs) > > - { > > - basic_string<_CharT, _Traits, _Alloc> __str(__lhs); > > - __str.append(__rhs); > > - return __str; > > - } > > + const _CharT* __rhs); > > > > /** > > * @brief Concatenate string and character. > > diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/basic_string.tcc > > b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/basic_string.tcc > > index 4563c61429a..95ba8e503e9 100644 > > --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/basic_string.tcc > > +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/basic_string.tcc > > @@ -640,6 +640,27 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION > > return __str; > > } > > > > + template<typename _CharT, typename _Traits, typename _Alloc> > > + _GLIBCXX20_CONSTEXPR > > + basic_string<_CharT, _Traits, _Alloc> > > + operator+(const basic_string<_CharT, _Traits, _Alloc>& __lhs, > > + const _CharT* __rhs) > > + { > > + __glibcxx_requires_string(__rhs); > > + typedef basic_string<_CharT, _Traits, _Alloc> __string_type; > > + typedef typename __string_type::size_type __size_type; > > + typedef typename __gnu_cxx::__alloc_traits<_Alloc>::template > > + rebind<_CharT>::other _Char_alloc_type; > > + typedef __gnu_cxx::__alloc_traits<_Char_alloc_type> _Alloc_traits; > > + const __size_type __len = _Traits::length(__rhs); > > + __string_type __str(_Alloc_traits::_S_select_on_copy( > > + __lhs.get_allocator())); > > + __str.reserve(__len + __lhs.size()); > > + __str.append(__lhs); > > + __str.append(__rhs, __len); > > + return __str; > > + } > > + > > template<typename _CharT, typename _Traits, typename _Alloc> > > _GLIBCXX_STRING_CONSTEXPR > > typename basic_string<_CharT, _Traits, _Alloc>::size_type > > -- > > 2.34.1 > > >