On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 12:12 PM Aldy Hernandez <al...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> It looks like we're missing a newline for cases where we don't print
> anything.
>
> OK?
OK
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> * tree-ssa-threadbackward.cc (possibly_profitable_path_p): Always
> add newline.
> (profitable_path_p): Same.
> ---
> gcc/tree-ssa-threadbackward.cc | 10 +++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-threadbackward.cc b/gcc/tree-ssa-threadbackward.cc
> index 3218ad931ef..9725f50e639 100644
> --- a/gcc/tree-ssa-threadbackward.cc
> +++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-threadbackward.cc
> @@ -719,7 +719,11 @@ back_threader_profitability::possibly_profitable_path_p
> gimple *stmt = gsi_stmt (gsi);
> if (gimple_call_internal_p (stmt, IFN_UNIQUE)
> || gimple_call_builtin_p (stmt, BUILT_IN_CONSTANT_P))
> - return false;
> + {
> + if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
> + fputc ('\n', dump_file);
> + return false;
> + }
> /* Do not count empty statements and labels. */
> if (gimple_code (stmt) != GIMPLE_NOP
> && !is_gimple_debug (stmt))
> @@ -821,6 +825,8 @@ back_threader_profitability::possibly_profitable_path_p
> && (m_n_insns * param_fsm_scale_path_stmts
> >= param_max_jump_thread_duplication_stmts));
>
> + if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
> + fputc ('\n', dump_file);
> return true;
> }
>
> @@ -947,6 +953,8 @@ back_threader_profitability::profitable_path_p (const
> vec<basic_block> &m_path,
> "non-empty latch\n");
> return false;
> }
> + if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
> + fputc ('\n', dump_file);
> return true;
> }
>
> --
> 2.37.1
>
