The following fixes PR105646, not diagnosing

int f1();
int f3(){
    auto const & a = f1();
    bool v3{v3};
    return a;
}

with optimization because the early uninit diagnostic pass only
diagnoses always executed cases.  The patch does this by
re-interpreting what always executed means and choosing to
ignore exceptional and abnormal control flow for this.  At the
same time it improves things as suggested in a comment - when
the value-numbering run done without optimizing figures there's
a fallthru path, consider blocks on it as always executed.

Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.

OK?

Thanks,
Richard.

        PR tree-optimization/105646
        * tree-ssa-uninit.cc (warn_uninitialized_vars): Pre-compute
        the set of fallthru reachable blocks from function entry
        and use that to determine wlims.always_executed.

        * g++.dg/uninit-pr105646.C: New testcase.
---
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/uninit-pr105646.C | 17 +++++++++
 gcc/tree-ssa-uninit.cc                 | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++-----
 2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/uninit-pr105646.C

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/uninit-pr105646.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/uninit-pr105646.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..48ceb986ec6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/uninit-pr105646.C
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+// { dg-do compile }
+// { dg-require-effective-target c++11 }
+// { dg-options "-O2 -Wuninitialized" }
+
+int f1();
+int f2(){
+    bool v2{v2}; // { dg-warning "is used uninitialized" }
+    auto const & a = f1();
+    return a;
+}
+int f3(){
+    auto const & a = f1();
+    // Diagnose the following when optimizing and as unconditional
+    // uninitialized use despite f1 possibly throwing
+    bool v3{v3}; // { dg-warning "is used uninitialized" }
+    return a;
+}
diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-uninit.cc b/gcc/tree-ssa-uninit.cc
index 7074c9117b2..b687e24a7e6 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-ssa-uninit.cc
+++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-uninit.cc
@@ -987,10 +987,49 @@ warn_uninitialized_vars (bool wmaybe_uninit)
   wlimits wlims = { };
   wlims.wmaybe_uninit = wmaybe_uninit;
 
-  gimple_stmt_iterator gsi;
-  basic_block bb;
+  auto_bb_flag ft_reachable (cfun);
+
+  /* Mark blocks that are always executed when we ignore provably
+     not executed and EH and abnormal edges.  */
+  basic_block bb = single_succ (ENTRY_BLOCK_PTR_FOR_FN (cfun));
+  while (!(bb->flags & ft_reachable))
+    {
+      bb->flags |= ft_reachable;
+      edge e = find_fallthru_edge (bb->succs);
+      if (e && e->flags & EDGE_EXECUTABLE)
+       {
+         bb = e->dest;
+         continue;
+       }
+      /* Find a single executable edge.  */
+      edge_iterator ei;
+      edge ee = NULL;
+      FOR_EACH_EDGE (e, ei, bb->succs)
+       if (e->flags & EDGE_EXECUTABLE)
+         {
+           if (!ee)
+             ee = e;
+           else
+             {
+               ee = NULL;
+               break;
+             }
+         }
+      if (ee)
+       bb = ee->dest;
+      else
+       {
+         bb = get_immediate_dominator (CDI_POST_DOMINATORS, bb);
+         if (!bb || bb->index == EXIT_BLOCK)
+           break;
+       }
+    }
+
   FOR_EACH_BB_FN (bb, cfun)
     {
+      wlims.always_executed = (bb->flags & ft_reachable);
+      bb->flags &= ~ft_reachable;
+
       edge_iterator ei;
       edge e;
       FOR_EACH_EDGE (e, ei, bb->preds)
@@ -1001,14 +1040,10 @@ warn_uninitialized_vars (bool wmaybe_uninit)
       if (!e)
        continue;
 
-      basic_block succ = single_succ (ENTRY_BLOCK_PTR_FOR_FN (cfun));
-      /* ???  This could be improved when we use a greedy walk and have
-        some edges marked as not executable.  */
-      wlims.always_executed = dominated_by_p (CDI_POST_DOMINATORS, succ, bb);
-
       if (wlims.always_executed)
        warn_uninit_phi_uses (bb);
 
+      gimple_stmt_iterator gsi;
       for (gsi = gsi_start_bb (bb); !gsi_end_p (gsi); gsi_next (&gsi))
        {
          gimple *stmt = gsi_stmt (gsi);
@@ -1029,7 +1064,7 @@ warn_uninitialized_vars (bool wmaybe_uninit)
          FOR_EACH_SSA_USE_OPERAND (use_p, stmt, op_iter, SSA_OP_USE)
            {
              /* BIT_INSERT_EXPR first operand should not be considered
-                a use for the purpose of uninit warnings.  */
+                a use for the purpose of uninit warnings.  */
              if (gassign *ass = dyn_cast <gassign *> (stmt))
                {
                  if (gimple_assign_rhs_code (ass) == BIT_INSERT_EXPR
@@ -1040,7 +1075,7 @@ warn_uninitialized_vars (bool wmaybe_uninit)
              if (wlims.always_executed)
                warn_uninit (OPT_Wuninitialized, use,
                             SSA_NAME_VAR (use), stmt);
-             else if (wmaybe_uninit)
+             else if (wlims.wmaybe_uninit)
                warn_uninit (OPT_Wmaybe_uninitialized, use,
                             SSA_NAME_VAR (use), stmt);
            }
-- 
2.35.3

Reply via email to