Hi, As a comment in https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-August/599556.html
Those splitters call rs6000_emit_set_const directly, and the replacements are never used. Using (pc) would be less misleading. This patch pass bootstrap®test on ppc64 BE and LE. Is this ok for trunk. BR, Jeff(Jiufu) gcc/ChangeLog: * config/rs6000/rs6000.md: (constant splitters): Use "(pc)" as the replacements. --- gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md | 12 +++--------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md index 1367a2cb779..7fadbeef1aa 100644 --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md @@ -7727,11 +7727,7 @@ (define_split [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "gpc_reg_operand") (match_operand:SI 1 "const_int_operand"))] "num_insns_constant (operands[1], SImode) > 1" - [(set (match_dup 0) - (match_dup 2)) - (set (match_dup 0) - (ior:SI (match_dup 0) - (match_dup 3)))] + [(pc)] { if (rs6000_emit_set_const (operands[0], operands[1])) DONE; @@ -9662,8 +9658,7 @@ (define_split [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "int_reg_operand_not_pseudo") (match_operand:DI 1 "const_int_operand"))] "TARGET_POWERPC64 && num_insns_constant (operands[1], DImode) > 1" - [(set (match_dup 0) (match_dup 2)) - (set (match_dup 0) (plus:DI (match_dup 0) (match_dup 3)))] + [(pc)] { if (rs6000_emit_set_const (operands[0], operands[1])) DONE; @@ -9675,8 +9670,7 @@ (define_split [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "int_reg_operand_not_pseudo") (match_operand:DI 1 "const_scalar_int_operand"))] "TARGET_POWERPC64 && num_insns_constant (operands[1], DImode) > 1" - [(set (match_dup 0) (match_dup 2)) - (set (match_dup 0) (plus:DI (match_dup 0) (match_dup 3)))] + [(pc)] { if (rs6000_emit_set_const (operands[0], operands[1])) DONE; -- 2.17.1