A cleaner approach to fix this PR has been suggested by Andrew, which
is to just return false on range_on_edge for unsupported range types.
Tested on x86-64 Linux.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* gimple-range.cc (gimple_ranger::range_on_edge): Return false
when the result range type is unsupported.
---
gcc/gimple-range.cc | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/gimple-range.cc b/gcc/gimple-range.cc
index 7ac48303e4e..eb347eee45b 100644
--- a/gcc/gimple-range.cc
+++ b/gcc/gimple-range.cc
@@ -201,7 +201,9 @@ bool
gimple_ranger::range_on_edge (vrange &r, edge e, tree name)
{
Value_Range edge_range (TREE_TYPE (name));
- gcc_checking_assert (r.supports_type_p (TREE_TYPE (name)));
+
+ if (!r.supports_type_p (TREE_TYPE (name)))
+ return false;
// Do not process values along abnormal edges.
if (e->flags & EDGE_ABNORMAL)
--
2.36.1
