Doing so fixes various false positives from
-Wanalyzer-tainted-array-index at -O1 and above (e.g. seen on the
Linux kernel)

Successfully bootstrapped & regrtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
Pushed to trunk as r13-1768-g5e830693dd3356.

gcc/analyzer/ChangeLog:
        PR analyzer/106373
        * sm-taint.cc (taint_state_machine::on_condition): Potentially
        update the state of the RHS as well as the LHS.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
        PR analyzer/106373
        * gcc.dg/analyzer/torture/taint-read-index-3.c: New test.

Signed-off-by: David Malcolm <dmalc...@redhat.com>
---
 gcc/analyzer/sm-taint.cc                      | 18 +++++--
 .../analyzer/torture/taint-read-index-3.c     | 52 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/torture/taint-read-index-3.c

diff --git a/gcc/analyzer/sm-taint.cc b/gcc/analyzer/sm-taint.cc
index 9cb78886c9f..0486c01aaca 100644
--- a/gcc/analyzer/sm-taint.cc
+++ b/gcc/analyzer/sm-taint.cc
@@ -830,13 +830,11 @@ taint_state_machine::on_condition (sm_context *sm_ctxt,
                                   const gimple *stmt,
                                   const svalue *lhs,
                                   enum tree_code op,
-                                  const svalue *rhs ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED) const
+                                  const svalue *rhs) const
 {
   if (stmt == NULL)
     return;
 
-  // TODO: this doesn't use the RHS; should we make it symmetric?
-
   // TODO
   switch (op)
     {
@@ -845,10 +843,17 @@ taint_state_machine::on_condition (sm_context *sm_ctxt,
     case GE_EXPR:
     case GT_EXPR:
       {
+       /* (LHS >= RHS) or (LHS > RHS)
+          LHS gains a lower bound
+          RHS gains an upper bound.  */
        sm_ctxt->on_transition (node, stmt, lhs, m_tainted,
                                m_has_lb);
        sm_ctxt->on_transition (node, stmt, lhs, m_has_ub,
                                m_stop);
+       sm_ctxt->on_transition (node, stmt, rhs, m_tainted,
+                               m_has_ub);
+       sm_ctxt->on_transition (node, stmt, rhs, m_has_lb,
+                               m_stop);
       }
       break;
     case LE_EXPR:
@@ -896,10 +901,17 @@ taint_state_machine::on_condition (sm_context *sm_ctxt,
                  }
          }
 
+       /* (LHS <= RHS) or (LHS < RHS)
+          LHS gains an upper bound
+          RHS gains a lower bound.  */
        sm_ctxt->on_transition (node, stmt, lhs, m_tainted,
                                m_has_ub);
        sm_ctxt->on_transition (node, stmt, lhs, m_has_lb,
                                m_stop);
+       sm_ctxt->on_transition (node, stmt, rhs, m_tainted,
+                               m_has_lb);
+       sm_ctxt->on_transition (node, stmt, rhs, m_has_ub,
+                               m_stop);
       }
       break;
     default:
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/torture/taint-read-index-3.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/torture/taint-read-index-3.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..8eb6061a08b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/torture/taint-read-index-3.c
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+// TODO: remove need for the taint option:
+/* { dg-additional-options "-fanalyzer-checker=taint" } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "" { *-*-* } { "-fno-fat-lto-objects" } { "" } } */
+
+struct raw_ep {
+  /* ...snip... */
+  int state;
+  /* ...snip... */
+};
+
+struct raw_dev {
+  /* ...snip... */
+  struct raw_ep eps[30];
+  int eps_num;
+  /* ...snip... */
+};
+
+int   __attribute__((tainted_args))
+simplified_raw_ioctl_ep_disable(struct raw_dev *dev, unsigned long value)
+{
+  int ret = 0, i = value;
+
+  if (i < 0 || i >= dev->eps_num) {
+    ret = -16;
+    goto out_unlock;
+  }
+  if (dev->eps[i].state == 0) { /* { dg-bogus "attacker-controlled" } */
+    ret = -22;
+    goto out_unlock;
+  }
+
+out_unlock:
+  return ret;
+}
+
+int   __attribute__((tainted_args))
+test_2(struct raw_dev *dev, int i)
+{
+  int ret = 0;
+
+  if (i < 0 || i >= dev->eps_num) {
+    ret = -16;
+    goto out_unlock;
+  }
+  if (dev->eps[i].state == 0) { /* { dg-bogus "attacker-controlled" } */
+    ret = -22;
+    goto out_unlock;
+  }
+
+out_unlock:
+  return ret;
+}
-- 
2.26.3

Reply via email to