Hi. As noticed in the PR, I wrongly introduced /= and *= operators. Problem was that these operators need to modify *this object.
Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests. Ready to be installed? Thanks, Martin PR middle-end/106059 gcc/ChangeLog: * profile-count.h: *= and /= operators need to modify this object. --- gcc/profile-count.h | 20 ++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/profile-count.h b/gcc/profile-count.h index be6e2d57cf7..141a8827001 100644 --- a/gcc/profile-count.h +++ b/gcc/profile-count.h @@ -605,9 +605,10 @@ public: return apply_scale (num, 1); } - profile_probability operator*= (int64_t den) const + profile_probability operator*= (int64_t num) { - return *this * den; + *this = apply_scale (num, 1); + return *this; } profile_probability operator/ (int64_t den) const @@ -615,9 +616,10 @@ public: return apply_scale (1, den); } - profile_probability operator/= (int64_t den) const + profile_probability operator/= (int64_t den) { - return *this / den; + *this = apply_scale (1, den); + return *this; } /* Get the value of the count. */ @@ -1017,9 +1019,10 @@ public: return apply_scale (num, 1); } - profile_count operator*= (int64_t den) const + profile_count operator*= (int64_t num) { - return *this * den; + *this = apply_scale (num, 1); + return *this; } profile_count operator/ (int64_t den) const @@ -1027,9 +1030,10 @@ public: return apply_scale (1, den); } - profile_count operator/= (int64_t den) const + profile_count operator/= (int64_t den) { - return *this / den; + *this = apply_scale (1, den); + return *this; } /* Return true when value is not zero and can be used for scaling. -- 2.36.1