On Jun 22, 2022, Alexandre Oliva <ol...@adacore.com> wrote: > Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu, also tested with a cross to > aarch64-rtems6. Ok to install?
The early wakeups are fixed for rtems6.1, so the same question raised at https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-June/597102.html apply to this one: libstdc++: xfail nanosleep tests on rtems From: Alexandre Oliva <ol...@adacore.com> Since it has been determined that nanosleep may return slightly too early on RTEMS, due to clock resolution differences, expect 30_thread/async tests that have detected too-early wakeups to fail on RTEMS targets. for libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog * testsuite/30_threads/async/async.cc: xfail on RTEMS. TN: V608-048 --- libstdc++-v3/testsuite/30_threads/async/async.cc | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/30_threads/async/async.cc b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/30_threads/async/async.cc index 38943ff1a9a5e..e0b731186c459 100644 --- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/30_threads/async/async.cc +++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/30_threads/async/async.cc @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ // { dg-additional-options "-pthread" { target pthread } } // { dg-require-effective-target c++11 } // { dg-require-gthreads "" } +// { dg-xfail-if "nanosleep may wake up too early" { *-*-rtems* } } // Copyright (C) 2010-2022 Free Software Foundation, Inc. // -- Alexandre Oliva, happy hacker https://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo/ Free Software Activist GNU Toolchain Engineer Disinformation flourishes because many people care deeply about injustice but very few check the facts. Ask me about <https://stallmansupport.org>
