Hello, I added the ! default_packed directive, and now the test is properly skipped on the targets with that property. I tested with cris-elf target and the test behaves properly.
Best regards, Vit Kabele -- >8 -- Subject: [PATCH v2] c: Extend the -Wpadded message with actual padding size When the compiler warns about padding struct to alignment boundary, it now also informs the user about the size of the alignment that needs to be added to get rid of the warning. This removes the need of using pahole or similar tools, or manually determining the padding size. Tested for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu and cris-elf targets. gcc/ChangeLog: * stor-layout.cc (finalize_record_size): Extend warning message. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * c-c++-common/Wpadded.c: New test. Signed-off-by: Vit Kabele <vit.kab...@sysgo.com> --- gcc/stor-layout.cc | 7 ++++++- gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wpadded.c | 13 +++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wpadded.c diff --git a/gcc/stor-layout.cc b/gcc/stor-layout.cc index 765f22f68b9..88923c4136b 100644 --- a/gcc/stor-layout.cc +++ b/gcc/stor-layout.cc @@ -1781,7 +1781,12 @@ finalize_record_size (record_layout_info rli) && simple_cst_equal (unpadded_size, TYPE_SIZE (rli->t)) == 0 && input_location != BUILTINS_LOCATION && !TYPE_ARTIFICIAL (rli->t)) - warning (OPT_Wpadded, "padding struct size to alignment boundary"); + { + tree pad_size + = size_binop (MINUS_EXPR, TYPE_SIZE_UNIT (rli->t), unpadded_size_unit); + warning (OPT_Wpadded, + "padding struct size to alignment boundary with %E bytes", pad_size); + } if (warn_packed && TREE_CODE (rli->t) == RECORD_TYPE && TYPE_PACKED (rli->t) && ! rli->packed_maybe_necessary diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wpadded.c b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wpadded.c new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9e7e9f240c1 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wpadded.c @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-options "-Wpadded" } */ + +/* + * The struct is on single line, because C++ compiler emits the -Wpadded + * warning at the first line of the struct definition, while the C compiler at + * the last line. This way the test passes on both. + * + * The test is skipped on targets where default behavior is to pack the + * structs because there is no warning triggered. + */ +struct S { __UINT32_TYPE__ i; char c; } foo; /* { dg-warning "padding struct size to alignment boundary with 3 bytes" "" { target { ! default_packed } } } */ + -- 2.30.2