Hi!
When looking up the -Waddress documentation due to some PR that mentioned it,
I've noticed some typos and thus I'm fixing them.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, committed to trunk
as obvious.
2022-06-09 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
* doc/invoke.texi (-Waddress): Fix a typo in small example.
Fix typos inptr_t -> intptr_t and uinptr_t -> uintptr_t.
--- gcc/doc/invoke.texi.jj 2022-06-03 11:20:13.155071628 +0200
+++ gcc/doc/invoke.texi 2022-06-08 18:05:17.205340980 +0200
@@ -8901,7 +8901,7 @@ such as in
void f (void);
void g (void)
@{
- if (!func) // warning: expression evaluates to false
+ if (!f) // warning: expression evaluates to false
abort ();
@}
@end smallexample
@@ -8927,7 +8927,7 @@ weak symbols), so their use in a conditi
parentheses in a function call or a missing dereference in an array
expression. The subset of the warning for object pointers can be
suppressed by casting the pointer operand to an integer type such
-as @code{inptr_t} or @code{uinptr_t}.
+as @code{intptr_t} or @code{uintptr_t}.
Comparisons against string literals result in unspecified behavior
and are not portable, and suggest the intent was to call @code{strcmp}.
The warning is suppressed if the suspicious expression is the result
Jakub
