Martin Jambor wrote: > Hi, > > this is another iteration of my attempts to fix expansion of > misaligned memory accesses on strict-alignment platforms (which was > suggested by Richi in > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-08/msg00931.html and my first > attempt was posted as > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-01/msg00319.html). > > This time I got further, to big extent thanks to parts of Richi's > fixes of PR 50444 which cleaned up expr.c considerably. I have > successfully bootstrapped the combined patch on x86_64-linux, > i686-linux, ia64-linux (without Ada) and sparc64-linux (without Java). > I have run the c and c++ testsuites on individual patches on sparc64 > and ia64 too. > > Nevertheless, since I still lack experience in this area, there will > almost certainly be comments and suggestions and therefore I have > divided the three main changes to three different patches, so that > they are easier to comment on by both me and anybody reviewing them. > > Thanks in advance for any comments, > > Martin
Hi Martin. The new test cases make implications on the size of int: for example they crash for targets with sizeof(int) == 2 Johann
